[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-2476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Luciano Blasetti commented on AS7-2476:
---------------------------------------
Actually I think that from an architectural point of view the request should be kept into
account and it should be part of the main AS7.
Having a common framework for delivering both soap and restful service would minimize the
libraries and the dependencies on the server side, optimizing also the memory usage (e.g.
if you have a service exposed with both soap and rest). Besides Apache CXF provide
features not included in Resteasy, like the automatic generation of WADL descriptors.
I perfectly understand that Resteasy is a "friend" JBoss project, but in my
opinion the design of the application server should not be influenced by policies and
decisions not directly driven by technical motivations.
Allow to choose CXF as jax-rs provider instead of Resteasy
----------------------------------------------------------
Key: AS7-2476
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-2476
Project: Application Server 7
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: REST, Web Services
Affects Versions: 7.0.2.Final
Reporter: Luciano Blasetti
Assignee: Stuart Douglas
Since Apache CXF provides a very good support for jax-rs and it is the mechanism for
providing jax-ws in AS7, it does make sense to adopt it also for jax-rs services (it would
be a more homogeneous solution), at least giving the chance to choose between the resteasy
and cxf implementation through a configuration option.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira