[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Harry Mark edited comment on JGRP-1618 at 4/25/13 6:16 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Bela, thanks for looking into this.
To track it down, I had to put in a lot of print statements into the code, run load tests
across multiple servers, and analyze the logs. That's when I was able to identify the
problem, which only shows up when there's enough load to cause UDP messages to arrive
out of order.
To deploy the fix, I created a jar with the patched NakReceiverWindow, which is loaded
before the jgroups jar. I have attached it. This patch is only for JGroups 2.8.1.
was (Author: hmark):
Bela, thanks for looking into this.
To track it down, I had to put in a lot of print statements into the code, run load tests
across multiple servers, and analyze the logs. That's when I was able to identify the
problem, which only shows up when there's enough load to cause UDP messages to arrive
out of order.
To deploy the fix, I created a jar with the patched NakReceiverWindow, which is loaded
before the jgroups 2.8.1 jar. I have attached it.
missingMessageReceived() never called in NAKACK resulting in memory
leak
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JGRP-1618
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1618
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.8.1, 2.12.2
Environment: Java 6
Reporter: Harry Mark
Assignee: Bela Ban
Fix For: 3.2.9, 3.3
Attachments: 1618-jgrp-patch.jar, NakReceiverWindow.java
We are using JGroups 2.8.1 and encountered a memory leak where it eventually ran out of
CMS Old Gen memory. The heap dump revealed that the problem was in the xmit_stats
ConcurrentHashMap of org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.NAKACK.
After much analysis here's what we found: when the system is under load, messages
can start arriving out of order. When the receiver receives a higher sequence number than
expected, it requests the sender retransmit the missing messages with the lower sequence
numbers. The sender sends the missing message, however the bug in the NakReceiverWindow
meant that the missing message was never purged from the Map that tracks missing messages
(xmit_stats) because missingMessageReceived() was never invoked. Over time this Map grows
and starts using up CMS Old Gen; the only way it would get reduced was when a server left
the cluster and the missing messages were purged for that server.
In JMX, the MissingMsgsReceived attribute of
jgroups:cluster=*,protocol=NAKACK,type=protocol was always zero, confirming that it never
purged any received "missing messages".
When I looked at the most recent GA version 3.2.8 of NakReceiverWindow.java , it has the
corrected logic that ensures that missingMessageReceived() is called. I checked the the
most recent 2.x, which is 2.12.2, and found it also has the same bug in the logic as
2.8.1. This bug may apply to other 2.x but I did not check.
Attached is the fixed NakReceiverWindow.java for 2.8.1.
After applying the patch, the memory leak went away.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira