[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Benoit Leblanc updated JGRP-1369: --------------------------------- Description: MuxRpcDispatcher alters RequestOption's filter by encapsulating it with a NoMuxHandlerRspFilter. Passing the same instance of RequestOptions to rpc calls leads to : java.lang.StackOverflowError at org.jgroups.blocks.mux.NoMuxHandlerRspFilter.isAcceptable(NoMuxHandlerRspFilter.java:24) at org.jgroups.blocks.mux.NoMuxHandlerRspFilter.isAcceptable(NoMuxHandlerRspFilter.java:24) ..... ..... Solutions : 1/ "Clone" RequestOption at each call like fix used in https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1271. The drawback with this solution, is the performance concern : useless object creation if a RequestOption is reused. 2/ Don't encapsulate RequestOption if a NoMuxHandlerRspFilter is already setted. Modification concerns two classes : * NoMuxHandlerRspFilter private NoMuxHandlerRspFilter(RspFilter filter) { this.filter = filter; } public static RspFilter createInstance(RspFilter filter) { if (filter instanceof NoMuxHandlerRspFilter) { return filter; } return new NoMuxHandlerRspFilter(filter) ; } * MuxRpcDispatcher protected GroupRequest cast(Collection<Address> dests, Message msg, RequestOptions options, boolean blockForResults) { RspFilter filter = options.getRspFilter(); return super.cast(dests, msg, options.setRspFilter(NoMuxHandlerRspFilter.createInstance(filter)), blockForResults); } was: MuxRpcDispatcher alters RequestOption's filter by encapsulating it with a NoMuxHandlerRspFilter. Passing the same instance of RequestOptions to rpc calls leads to : java.lang.StackOverflowError at org.jgroups.blocks.mux.NoMuxHandlerRspFilter.isAcceptable(NoMuxHandlerRspFilter.java:24) at org.jgroups.blocks.mux.NoMuxHandlerRspFilter.isAcceptable(NoMuxHandlerRspFilter.java:24) ..... ..... Solutions : 1/ "Clone" RequestOption at each call like fix used in https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1271. The drawback with this solution, is the performance concern : useless object creation if a RequestOption is reused. 2/ Don't encapsulate RequestOption is a NoMuxHandlerRspFilter is already setted. Modification concerns two classes : * NoMuxHandlerRspFilter private NoMuxHandlerRspFilter(RspFilter filter) { this.filter = filter; } public static RspFilter createInstance(RspFilter filter) { if (filter instanceof NoMuxHandlerRspFilter) { return filter; } return new NoMuxHandlerRspFilter(filter) ; } * MuxRpcDispatcher protected GroupRequest cast(Collection<Address> dests, Message msg, RequestOptions options, boolean blockForResults) { RspFilter filter = options.getRspFilter(); return super.cast(dests, msg, options.setRspFilter(NoMuxHandlerRspFilter.createInstance(filter)), blockForResults); } Forum Reference: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4E80A39A.2090908... (was: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4E80A39A.2090908...) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Bela Ban commented on JGRP-1369: -------------------------------- Added the test to the testsuite (RequestOptionsTest) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Bela Ban resolved JGRP-1369. ---------------------------- Resolution: Done Picked option #2. Applied on master and 2.12 branches -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira