Edson Tirelli created JBRULES-3355: -------------------------------------- Summary: Problems when writing rhs in Rule API Key: JBRULES-3355 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3355 Project: Drools Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: drools-compiler Affects Versions: 5.4.0.Beta1, 5.3.1.Final Reporter: Edson Tirelli Assignee: Edson Tirelli Fix For: 5.3.2.Final, 5.4.0.Beta2 Description of problem: There are several problems when writing rhs of a rule in Rule API: - if you omit rhs() you 'nullend' on the end of the rule which results in compile error - if you put comment in rhs() like rhs("//consequences") you get '//consequencesend' which result in compile error as well I think there should be line delimiter behind rhs and that if rhs is omitted it should result in empty string rather than "null". KnowledgeDescr descr = DescrFactory.newPackage().name("org.sample") .newRule().name("results in consequencesend") .rhs("//consequences") .end() .newRule().name("results in nullend") .lhs() .pattern("String").end() .end() .end() .getDescr(); -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira