[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug...
]
Nikolaj Tørring edited comment on JBRULES-2934 at 9/6/11 5:05 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not just use the existing CommandFactoryprovider? E.g.
public static Command newStartProcess(String processId,
Map<String, Object> parameters) { return
getCommandFactoryProvider().newStartProcess( processId, parameters ); }
was (Author: n.torring):
Why not just use the existing CommandFactoryprovider? E.g.
CommandFactory newStartProcess doesn't set parameters
-----------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-2934
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2934
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: drools-core
Affects Versions: 5.2.0.M1
Reporter: Dan Seaver
Assignee: Mauricio Salatino
Labels: droolsjbpm,, startProcess,
Fix For: 5.3.0.CR1
Should be able to set parameter values when starting a process. Current code:
public static Command newStartProcess(String processId,
Map<String, Object> parameters) {
return getCommandFactoryProvider().newStartProcess( processId );
}
proposed code:
public static Command newStartProcess(String processId,
Map<String, Object> parameters) {
StartProcessCommand cmd = new StartProcessCommand(processId);
cmd.setParameters(parameters);
return cmd;
}
Also, I think this issue would go under the droolsjbpm-knowledge component if the JIRA
component list were updated.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira