8:58 a.m.
Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-1422
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422
Project: JBoss Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Drl Parser/Builder
Affects Versions: 4.0.2
Reporter: Alexandre Gattiker
The documentation on the 'and' Conditional Element seems to imply that these
constructs are equivalent:
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (and
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
and eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
Actually, the first version crashes with this message:
unknown:93:7 Unexpected token 'and'[96,2]: unknown:96:2 mismatched token:
[@792,3685:3685=')',<12>,96:2]; expecting type THEN
I'm on drools 4.0.2 and mvel14-1.2.8.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
5:58 p.m.
New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBRULES-1422) Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422?page=all ]
Mark Proctor updated JBRULES-1422:
----------------------------------
Assignee: Edson Tirelli
Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-1422
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422
Project: JBoss Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Drl Parser/Builder
Affects Versions: 4.0.2
Reporter: Alexandre Gattiker
Assigned To: Edson Tirelli
The documentation on the 'and' Conditional Element seems to imply that these
constructs are equivalent:
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (and
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
and eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
Actually, the first version crashes with this message:
unknown:93:7 Unexpected token 'and'[96,2]: unknown:96:2 mismatched token:
[@792,3685:3685=')',<12>,96:2]; expecting type THEN
I'm on drools 4.0.2 and mvel14-1.2.8.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
8:04 p.m.
New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBRULES-1422) Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422?page=comments#action_12402551 ]
Edson Tirelli commented on JBRULES-1422:
----------------------------------------
Prefix CEs require a pair of enclosing () by themselves:
A() and B()
(and A() B() )
As NOT CE also requires a pair of () for non-simple patterns, the correct is:
not( A() and B() )
not( (and A() B() ) )
Having said that, we know that this limitation is annoying and we will try to fix it for
the next major release, but not for 4.0.x.
Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-1422
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422
Project: JBoss Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Drl Parser/Builder
Affects Versions: 4.0.2
Reporter: Alexandre Gattiker
Assigned To: Edson Tirelli
The documentation on the 'and' Conditional Element seems to imply that these
constructs are equivalent:
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (and
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
and eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
Actually, the first version crashes with this message:
unknown:93:7 Unexpected token 'and'[96,2]: unknown:96:2 mismatched token:
[@792,3685:3685=')',<12>,96:2]; expecting type THEN
I'm on drools 4.0.2 and mvel14-1.2.8.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
8:10 p.m.
New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBRULES-1422) Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422?page=all ]
Edson Tirelli updated JBRULES-1422:
-----------------------------------
Workaround Description:
use double () when using not with infix CEs:
either:
not( A() and B() )
or:
not( (and A() B() ) )
Fix Version/s: 5.0.0-M1
Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-1422
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422
Project: JBoss Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Drl Parser/Builder
Affects Versions: 4.0.2
Reporter: Alexandre Gattiker
Assigned To: Edson Tirelli
Fix For: 5.0.0-M1
The documentation on the 'and' Conditional Element seems to imply that these
constructs are equivalent:
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (and
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
and eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
Actually, the first version crashes with this message:
unknown:93:7 Unexpected token 'and'[96,2]: unknown:96:2 mismatched token:
[@792,3685:3685=')',<12>,96:2]; expecting type THEN
I'm on drools 4.0.2 and mvel14-1.2.8.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12:36 a.m.
New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBRULES-1422) Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422?page=comments#action_12409241 ]
Edson Tirelli commented on JBRULES-1422:
----------------------------------------
Just as examples, for documentations purposes, both rules should work:
rule "no one likes cheeses 1"
when
not( Person( $likes : likes ) and
Cheese( type == $likes )
)
then
// do something
end
rule "no one likes cheeses 2"
when
not( and Person( $likes : likes )
Cheese( type == $likes )
)
then
// do something
end
Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-1422
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422
Project: JBoss Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Drl Parser/Builder
Affects Versions: 4.0.2
Reporter: Alexandre Gattiker
Assigned To: Edson Tirelli
Fix For: 5.0.0-M1
The documentation on the 'and' Conditional Element seems to imply that these
constructs are equivalent:
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (and
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
and eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
Actually, the first version crashes with this message:
unknown:93:7 Unexpected token 'and'[96,2]: unknown:96:2 mismatched token:
[@792,3685:3685=')',<12>,96:2]; expecting type THEN
I'm on drools 4.0.2 and mvel14-1.2.8.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
2:53 p.m.
New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBRULES-1422) Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422?page=comments#action_12411576 ]
Edson Tirelli commented on JBRULES-1422:
----------------------------------------
This is solved in the new parser for drools 5.
Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-1422
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422
Project: JBoss Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Drl Parser/Builder
Affects Versions: 4.0.2
Reporter: Alexandre Gattiker
Assigned To: Edson Tirelli
Fix For: 5.0.0-M1
The documentation on the 'and' Conditional Element seems to imply that these
constructs are equivalent:
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (and
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
and eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
Actually, the first version crashes with this message:
unknown:93:7 Unexpected token 'and'[96,2]: unknown:96:2 mismatched token:
[@792,3685:3685=')',<12>,96:2]; expecting type THEN
I'm on drools 4.0.2 and mvel14-1.2.8.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
2:20 a.m.
New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBRULES-1422) Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422?page=com.atlassian.jira.p...
]
Mark Proctor updated JBRULES-1422:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 5.0.0.M2
(was: 5.0.0.M1)
Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-1422
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422
Project: JBoss Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Drl Parser/Builder
Affects Versions: 4.0.2
Reporter: Alexandre Gattiker
Assignee: Edson Tirelli
Fix For: 5.0.0.M2
The documentation on the 'and' Conditional Element seems to imply that these
constructs are equivalent:
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (and
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
and eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
Actually, the first version crashes with this message:
unknown:93:7 Unexpected token 'and'[96,2]: unknown:96:2 mismatched token:
[@792,3685:3685=')',<12>,96:2]; expecting type THEN
I'm on drools 4.0.2 and mvel14-1.2.8.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
2:34 a.m.
New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBRULES-1422) Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422?page=com.atlassian.jira.p...
]
Mark Proctor updated JBRULES-1422:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 5.0.0.M3
(was: 5.0.0.M2)
Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-1422
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422
Project: JBoss Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Drl Parser/Builder
Affects Versions: 4.0.2
Reporter: Alexandre Gattiker
Assignee: Edson Tirelli
Fix For: 5.0.0.M3
The documentation on the 'and' Conditional Element seems to imply that these
constructs are equivalent:
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (and
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
and eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
Actually, the first version crashes with this message:
unknown:93:7 Unexpected token 'and'[96,2]: unknown:96:2 mismatched token:
[@792,3685:3685=')',<12>,96:2]; expecting type THEN
I'm on drools 4.0.2 and mvel14-1.2.8.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
4:51 p.m.
New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBRULES-1422) Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422?page=com.atlassian.jira.p...
]
Edson Tirelli updated JBRULES-1422:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 5.0.0.CR1
(was: 5.0.0.M3)
Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-1422
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422
Project: JBoss Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: drools-compiler
Affects Versions: 4.0.2
Reporter: Alexandre Gattiker
Assignee: Edson Tirelli
Fix For: 5.0.0.CR1
The documentation on the 'and' Conditional Element seems to imply that these
constructs are equivalent:
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (and
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
and eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
Actually, the first version crashes with this message:
unknown:93:7 Unexpected token 'and'[96,2]: unknown:96:2 mismatched token:
[@792,3685:3685=')',<12>,96:2]; expecting type THEN
I'm on drools 4.0.2 and mvel14-1.2.8.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
4:32 a.m.
New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBRULES-1422) Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422?page=com.atlassian.jira.p...
]
Mark Proctor updated JBRULES-1422:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 5.0.0.CR1
(was: 5.0.0.M5)
Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-1422
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422
Project: JBoss Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: drools-compiler
Affects Versions: 4.0.2
Reporter: Alexandre Gattiker
Assignee: Edson Tirelli
Fix For: 5.0.0.CR1
The documentation on the 'and' Conditional Element seems to imply that these
constructs are equivalent:
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (and
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
and eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
Actually, the first version crashes with this message:
unknown:93:7 Unexpected token 'and'[96,2]: unknown:96:2 mismatched token:
[@792,3685:3685=')',<12>,96:2]; expecting type THEN
I'm on drools 4.0.2 and mvel14-1.2.8.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
3:28 a.m.
New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBRULES-1422) Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422?page=com.atlassian.jira.p...
]
Mark Proctor updated JBRULES-1422:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 5.0.0.GA
(was: 5.0.0.CR1)
Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-1422
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422
Project: JBoss Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: drools-compiler
Affects Versions: 4.0.2
Reporter: Alexandre Gattiker
Assignee: Edson Tirelli
Fix For: 5.0.0.GA
The documentation on the 'and' Conditional Element seems to imply that these
constructs are equivalent:
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (and
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
and eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
Actually, the first version crashes with this message:
unknown:93:7 Unexpected token 'and'[96,2]: unknown:96:2 mismatched token:
[@792,3685:3685=')',<12>,96:2]; expecting type THEN
I'm on drools 4.0.2 and mvel14-1.2.8.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
8:27 p.m.
New subject: [JBoss JIRA] Closed: (JBRULES-1422) Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422?page=com.atlassian.jira.p...
]
Edson Tirelli closed JBRULES-1422.
----------------------------------
Resolution: Done
Fixed in Drools 5.
Prefix 'and' and infix 'and' not interchangeable
------------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-1422
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-1422
Project: JBoss Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: drools-compiler
Affects Versions: 4.0.2
Reporter: Alexandre Gattiker
Assignee: Edson Tirelli
Fix For: 5.0.0.GA
The documentation on the 'and' Conditional Element seems to imply that these
constructs are equivalent:
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (and
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
$p1:Entity($code1:code)
not (
$p2:Entity(code == $code1)
and eval(MyStaticClass.match($p1, $p2))
)
Actually, the first version crashes with this message:
unknown:93:7 Unexpected token 'and'[96,2]: unknown:96:2 mismatched token:
[@792,3685:3685=')',<12>,96:2]; expecting type THEN
I'm on drools 4.0.2 and mvel14-1.2.8.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
5608
days inactive
6091
days old
11 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Alexandre Gattiker (JIRA) -
Edson Tirelli (JIRA)
-
Mark Proctor (JIRA)