]
Nuno Godinho de Matos edited comment on WFCORE-3210 at 8/31/17 4:56 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Understood.
I Hope it is now clear what we want to achieve.
I would also mention that on the topic of what we are trying to achieve, there is a
reference to an online blog entry where a person has done exactly the same thing that we
want to do here except the JUL logging is routed to Log4j2...
As for Stack traces.
There are none. Otherwise they would have naturally been added to the issue - as well as
on the Wildfly Forum - where I originally started a discussion on trying to understand how
to resolve this problem.
There are no stack traces because you have at logging Level something exploding, and the
logging Implantation log4j1 is handling this log explosion situation by doing a STDERR
println to report on the issue encountered with the class loader.
As for the Module configuration.
Yes, the module configuration looks like a patch work indeed.
And yes, some of the comments are a bit out dated - because I did make several
experiments, including trying to not bundle log4j1.17 and trying to use the
org.jboss.log4j instead - which yielded me the infinite recursive logging issue.
The reason why the module looks this complicated is none-other then the result of multiple
Experiments to try to ultimately ban org jboss log4j classes from sneaking into this
handler module. That is why you also see all of those excludes with wild card paths...
You can be certain, I did not start by writing a module as complicated looking as you see
in the reference panel. That is where i ended up.
Thanks.
was (Author: nuno.godinhomatos):
Understood.
Nur now i Hope it is clear what we want to achieve.
Das for Stack traced there are none.
Because you have at logging Level something exploding and the logging Implantation seems
to Default to Log to Standard Error the Problem.
As for the Module configuration.
It Looks complucated as a result of multiple Experiments to try to ban org jboss log4j
from sneaking in.
I for sure die Not star With a Module Kopplung linke a Patch Work. That is where i ended
up.
Thanks.
Wildfly module isolation not working consistently
-------------------------------------------------
Key: WFCORE-3210
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3210
Project: WildFly Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Logging, Modules
Affects Versions: 2.2.0.Final
Reporter: Nuno Godinho de Matos
There is an underministic bug on the module layer of wildfly, whereby the boot logic of
the application server is not ensured to give the appropriate module isolation - which can
lead to unexpected boot classpath problems.
An example of this phenomena is given on the wildfly forum thread:
https://developer.jboss.org/thread/275839
In this example, we have the logging subsystem setup to use a custome handler.
The custom handler wishes to have acces to the JUL extension classes on the
org.jboss.logmanger module, but wishes to do have no relationship with the
org.apache.log4j packages associated to the wildfly org.jboss.log4j module.
What we see in this example is that an application gets from wildfly mixed behavior.
Most of the time, during boot, the processes works without problem, where the custom
handler runs isolated from the undersired log4j libraries within wildfly.
But other times the application boot procedure will not go smoothly with the custom
handler having processes routing JUL LogRecords events into the bundled log4j because the
application server has loaded some of the classes that exist the org.jboss.log4j module.
And as we know when the same class is loaded by different class loaders, then that class
that orinates from class loader A cannot be assigned to the corresponding class of class
loader B, even if the classes are exactly the same.
This is not an isolated issue.
There are also open issues on the wildfly forum reporting on startup problems on the
logging subsystme where sometimes the LogManager class had not yet been loaded, and
sometimes this issue goes away.
This is an indication of some deep issue engrained into the module loading, where the
module isolation behavior is not ensured to work all the time and that the boot procedure
is not deterministically reliable.
It should not be that the application server some time starts successfully and others
not.
Booting wildfly should always result in the same outcode.
Problems of this nature with class loading problems should either always happen if the
configuration is not done properly or never happen if the configuration is proper.
In the case of thread:
https://developer.jboss.org/thread/275839
Our belief is that the configuration is doing all it possible can to request the
necessary module isolation from base packages and the outcome where log4j class load
problems take place should never be allowed to happen.
Many thanks.