[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Sri Ram edited comment on WFLY-2921 at 5/3/14 3:22 PM: ------------------------------------------------------- I think, It's the right condition. That method is expected to return "ipAddress:port" and not the "hostname:port" Reason : With this below condition, if an inet socket address is unresolved, then we can't get it's address (i.e., inet.getAddress() will return null) and the getHostName() will return whatever we passed as string). if(inet.isUnresolved()){ result.append(inet.getHostName()); }else{ result.append(formatPossibleIpv6Address(formatAddress(inet.getAddress()))); } << I'll post a patch with few more test cases to test the unresolved scenarios. Does it sounds good? was (Author: ramsrib): I think, It's the right condition. That method is expected to return "ipAddress:port" and not the "hostname:port" Reason : With this below condition, if an inet socket address is unresolved, then we can't get it's address (i.e., inet.getAddress() will return null) and the getHostName() will return whatever we passed as string). if(inet.isUnresolved()){ result.append(inet.getHostName()); }else{ result.append(formatPossibleIpv6Address(formatAddress(inet.getAddress()))); } << Does it sounds good? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.3#6260)