]
Nuno Godinho de Matos commented on WFCORE-3210:
-----------------------------------------------
Hi just a side note.
The JUL to Log4j router whose source code you have in the artifacts I have provided you
still has some bugs.
- 1 - The JUL log level to Log4j level mapping is bugy.
The JUL log Level OFF shuld be mapped to the Log4j log Level ALL.
In Log4j log level OFF is the highest rank possible, above Fatal, and it is only to be
used to qualify categories and never to be used to produce log statements. Someone who
uses OFF to log statements does not know what he is doing.
This bug leads to the fact that IRON JAC AMAR - which I am trying to debug, is producing
on many layers log statements with level OFF.
I was wondering why I could not filter them out until I realized this.
- 2 - In the cove version you have, you will have double logging of a LogRecord, whenever
that log record does not come with any MDC context. I was missing a return statement.
So you will see every log event logged twice.
These bugs however should not matter for this Jira, since the theme here is occasional
problematic startup of wildfly.
Many thanks.
Wildfly module isolation not working consistently
-------------------------------------------------
Key: WFCORE-3210
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3210
Project: WildFly Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Logging, Modules
Affects Versions: 2.2.0.Final
Reporter: Nuno Godinho de Matos
There is an underministic bug on the module layer of wildfly, whereby the boot logic of
the application server is not ensured to give the appropriate module isolation - which can
lead to unexpected boot classpath problems.
An example of this phenomena is given on the wildfly forum thread:
https://developer.jboss.org/thread/275839
In this example, we have the logging subsystem setup to use a custome handler.
The custom handler wishes to have acces to the JUL extension classes on the
org.jboss.logmanger module, but wishes to do have no relationship with the
org.apache.log4j packages associated to the wildfly org.jboss.log4j module.
What we see in this example is that an application gets from wildfly mixed behavior.
Most of the time, during boot, the processes works without problem, where the custom
handler runs isolated from the undersired log4j libraries within wildfly.
But other times the application boot procedure will not go smoothly with the custom
handler having processes routing JUL LogRecords events into the bundled log4j because the
application server has loaded some of the classes that exist the org.jboss.log4j module.
And as we know when the same class is loaded by different class loaders, then that class
that orinates from class loader A cannot be assigned to the corresponding class of class
loader B, even if the classes are exactly the same.
This is not an isolated issue.
There are also open issues on the wildfly forum reporting on startup problems on the
logging subsystme where sometimes the LogManager class had not yet been loaded, and
sometimes this issue goes away.
This is an indication of some deep issue engrained into the module loading, where the
module isolation behavior is not ensured to work all the time and that the boot procedure
is not deterministically reliable.
It should not be that the application server some time starts successfully and others
not.
Booting wildfly should always result in the same outcode.
Problems of this nature with class loading problems should either always happen if the
configuration is not done properly or never happen if the configuration is proper.
In the case of thread:
https://developer.jboss.org/thread/275839
Our belief is that the configuration is doing all it possible can to request the
necessary module isolation from base packages and the outcome where log4j class load
problems take place should never be allowed to happen.
Many thanks.