That is not a problem. I think the name was to differentiate this class from a similar
class that ran using JDK 1.4, and thus implies that at least JDK 5 is required for the
class you mentioned.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4215974#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...