November 2006 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBossWS] - Re: jbossws1.0.x is a preview implementation with support fo

by palin

"bocio" wrote : "maeste" wrote : | | Next days we have to implement ws clients and I'll keep you post of our result or problem. Well the goal of project is 2nd quarter 07 and I don't exclude to use jbossws 2.0CR | | | I'll look forward to hear about your tests | Just to keep you informed.. up to now we implemented a ws client/server communication in a pure JBoss<-->JBoss environment (1.0.3.GA) and had almost no problem (well, I modified by hand the jaxrpc-mapping.xml created by wstools just to use my own classes instead of the ones generated by the tool in wsdl2java mode). DTOs exchanged include complex types and arrays of complex types. Server side implemented with JSR181, client side JSR109. In future we're going to try jbossws client with .NET webservices. bye Alessio Soldano http://www.javalinux.it/blogs/ View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990187#3990187 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990187

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & Deployment] - Re: JBoss JAXB class loading problem

by weston.price＠jboss.com

I assume you have the the <use-jboss-web-loader> set to true in your jboss-service.xml file of your Tomcat configuration correct? Also, do you really require a scoped log4j and commons-logging configuration? I would start with simply overriding the JAXB stuff and then add things you need as you go along. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990185#3990185 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990185

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: connectionFactoryJndiName config property

by weston.price＠jboss.com

Hmmm...excellent. I know that you can do it via use of their JNDI stuff. I wasn't sure it would get bound to the adapter. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990184#3990184 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990184

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: connectionFactoryJndiName config property

by tobinibot

It looks like ActiveMQ is able to construct destinations on the fly through the resource adapter. I changed my destination to "queue/randomQueue" (which does not exists anywhere in any system). My bean deployed successfully, and when I sent a message to that queue (using a small JMS client outside JBoss), my MDB was executed. Very nice indeed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990183#3990183 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990183

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & Deployment] - Re: JBoss JAXB class loading problem

by DerJohannes

Can anyone give me a hint how to force JBoss to use the JAXB (2.0) classes from the jars I deploy instead of using the outdated ones in jboss4.0.4/server/default/lib/jboss-j2ee.jar ? Thank you in advance for your help. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990181#3990181 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990181

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: connectionFactoryJndiName config property

by weston.price＠jboss.com

No problem. I am glad you got it up and running! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990180#3990180 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990180

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Messaging, JMS & JBossMQ] - Re: connectionFactoryJndiName config property

by tobinibot

THAT WORKED!!! Thank you so much for your help, you have no idea how desperate we were getting. If anyone else is still reading along, here is what my final MDB looks like: package ejb; | | import javax.ejb.ActivationConfigProperty; | import javax.ejb.MessageDriven; | import javax.jms.Message; | import javax.jms.MessageListener; | import org.jboss.annotation.ejb.ResourceAdapter; | import org.jboss.logging.Logger; | | /** | * @author tjuday | */ | @MessageDriven(mappedName = "jms/SimpleMessageReceiverBean", activationConfig = { | @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "acknowledgeMode", propertyValue = "Auto-acknowledge"), | @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "destinationType", propertyValue = "javax.jms.Queue"), | @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = "destination", propertyValue = "queue.outbound") | }) | @ResourceAdapter("activemq-ra-4.0.2.rar") | public class SimpleMessageReceiverBean implements MessageListener { | private Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(SimpleMessageReceiverBean.class); | | public void onMessage(Message message) { | logger.info("received message"); | } | } I've got a little more playing around to do, I would like to see if ActiveMQ will create a non-existent destination, or if it has to be bound. I'll report back my findings here. Weston, again, thanks for your all you work. You've been a great help. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990179#3990179 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990179

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Remoting] - Re: Server dynamically loading classes from clients?

by tom.elrod＠jboss.com

Are correct in that JBoss Remoting only supports client loading classes from server. There is a feature request so will be both ways - http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBREM-47. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990177#3990177 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990177

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Excessive [could not destroy component] 1.1B1 to 1.1CR1

by rdewell

Yes I see that thread. Using the XML descriptor is merely configuring that annotation, so they are functionally equivalent. The XML has the downside of not being granular enough to say that Session scoped SFSB should have a longer timeout than say a Conversation scoped SFSB. You're up against Seam and JBoss notions of SFSB lifetimes, and AFAIK @CacheConfig is the ONLY way to handle this granularly. I'm originally reported this SFSB timeout issue with Seam: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-279 As is reported in that ticket, @CacheConfig used to solve this lifetime mismatch. I don't like the solution either, but there really was/is no other solution. As of sometime between b1 and cr1, however, something has happened and @CacheConfig doesn't do the trick anymore. Actually, it's even worse than before that reported ticket. On a related note, I'd really like to know how Seam is going to handle this problem across different JEE implementations. Could Seam "ping" the SFSB's it controls periodically so the container doesn't time them out? OR, are you suggesting that in the XML configuration we should set the SFSB timeout to Integer.MAX_VALUE? Effectively telling JBoss to never expire SFSB beans? That just seems like it would very dangerous and put a lot of responsibility on Seam to cleanup unexpected problems with lingering SFSB's. OR, if from Seam's standpoint this is a benign warning, could it do something else besides throw up a stack trace? Like: "WARN: Seam could not destroy component XVB. This is probably safe to ignore, but may represent an SFSB timeout setting that is too low for the Seam scope." View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990176#3990176 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990176

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBossCache] - Re: Working with TreeSet / checkSetRecursion bug? [v2.0 alph

by genman

And yes, your work around would be helpful, but if the underlying data is not sorted property, I don't really see it working very well... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3990175#3990175 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3990175

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user November 2006