February 2007 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss Seam] - Re: @DataModel and @DataModelSelection in separate component

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

yes View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4009132#4009132 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4009132

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - @DataModel and @DataModelSelection in separate components?

by prange

Is it possible to have one component outject a list with @DataModel, and let another component receive the @DataModelSelection injection? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4009131#4009131 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4009131

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - Re: Needed functionality (requirements)

by jimisola

Antoine, Thank you for your reply. Sadly, it was not much of a help. I'm unable to find the portal presentation to be honest. I've already read product datasheet and feature list. The only online demo I find runs 2.2.1-RC2 which - from what I've read - misses out on a lot of the new and good stuff in 2.6. The manuals have had their fair share of attention as well. To sum it up, I did not find any useful information on the things that I asked for in my original post - which I why I posted it. I was hoping for an honest option on the different features/services, e.g. "yes, there is a picture gallery. but, it is very basic and if this is a key feature then product X might be a better choice.". I can of course install JBoss Portal, OpenCMS, Liferay etc and have a look myself, but I rather get some initial information from the community and then go from there. One crucial question is whether JBoss Portal supports multiple sites. I may have missed that information, but if it doesn't it is less of a candidate. Also, the documentation does not mention "recommended" portlets or Best Practices. Regards, Jimisola View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4009130#4009130 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4009130

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: Transaction problem after upgrade

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

The bug is fixed. You have a different problem, probably you need a transaction and you don't have one. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4009129#4009129 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4009129

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: seam-gen vs. reference doc re Home setId()

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

Its really just a matter of taste. The typesafe methods are good if you plan to call the component programmatically. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4009127#4009127 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4009127

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Seam] - Re: MC/Seam integration and unification

by gavin.king＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : Really, how so? Package format would remain the same as it currently is, except bootstrap and config of bootstrap is the same as embedded jboss, jboss. If this Seam deployer could apply special deployment semantics to a standard Java EE 5 EAR, then great! In JBoss 4 this is not the case, special packaging and descriptors are required. anonymous wrote : I looked at your code and what you're doing deployment wise is *exactly* the same as what the kernel does except it is solely specific to Seam, minus the flexility. Our requirement in terms of deployment are pretty trivial and are handled by a very small amount of code which costs very little to maintain. Our requirements in terms of lifecycle management and context management are extremely nontrivial and can't be implemented on top of any other container that exists today. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4009124#4009124 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4009124

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user February 2007