March 2009 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss AOP] - Re: Method Advised class on getInterceptorChainReadWriteLock

by kabir.khan＠jboss.com

"Mike03" wrote : Cool, glad that patch worked out. | | Do you have any thoughts on the CCE we're getting with the ClassicInstrumentor and optimize=true? It seems like this is caused by generated code since were talking about an Item$ItemAdvisor but it wasn't apparent in the src decompilation of Item.class with JAD. | | How do you guys approach debugging generated bytecode? | | thanks for your help, | Mike Am about to fly back to Europe, so I can't look now. There isn't really a way to debug generated bytecode apart from adding System.out.printlns when adding it in javassist View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4215864#4215864 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4215864

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Cache: Core Edition] - Re: on child insert parent, child collection updated in DB b

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

"dukehoops" wrote : | I didn't understand your comment above. Were you saying that you will take my test source and adapt it to hibernate-jbc test suite or were you suggesting I do it? I meant I would do it, although if you want to do it and submit a patch that would be much appreciated. :-) I'm travelling next week so I wouldn't be able to port it for another week. anonymous wrote : | I took another look at hib-jbc project but could not find any examples of tests exercising hibernate and jbc *3*. I looked here: | http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/hibernate/core/trunk/cache-jbosscache2/ Have another look. :) An hour or so ago I committed a bunch of stuff for http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3585 which is the task to move to JBC 3. That task is really just to port tests from a branch where we proved last fall that the existing code already works with JBC 3. I added today some subtasks to HHH-3585 today related to some renaming stuff related to this, but the fact that those changes will eventually happen shouldn't prevent adding tests. anonymous wrote : | Debugging tells me I am using TransactionalAccessDelegate. Shouldn't OptimisticTxDelegate be used since my Domain object do use Hibernate's @Version? Or is that irrelevant because the two choices translate to deprecated Optimistic or Pessimistic locking in JBC and we're using MVCC? Correct it relates to JBC's OPTIMISTIC locking scheme, so isn't relevant to MVCC. anonymous wrote : | I also have caches configured as Srping Beans (with Configuration and RuntimeConfig also spring beans) and use org.jboss.cache.CacheFactory directly to build caches (as described in JBC3 User Guide). org.hibernate.cache.jbc2 on the other hand uses org.jboss.cache.CacheManager to do the same. The reason I went with that approach is that org.hibernate.cache.jbc2 seems to want to work of jbc2-styled treecache.xml config only and does not parse org.jboss.cache.config.Configuration If JBC 3 is used, the CacheManager can parse a JBC3-format file. It can also parse the legacy format. Building up the Configuration POJO and then injecting it into the CacheManager works too; that's what JBoss AS 5 does, just using the JBoss Microcontainer instead of Spring. I'll have to think about your REPEATABLE_READ issue. Do you see that with PESSIMISTIC or OPTIMISTIC instead of MVCC? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4215859#4215859 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4215859

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] - Re: Partial Refresh with Multiple Submit Buttons

by wesleyhales

Yes, and I just checked in the fix for it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4215856#4215856 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4215856

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Tools (users)] - Re: Hibernate reverse engineering errors

by max.andersen＠jboss.com

(ill follow up later with longer answer but deep in GA preps right now ;) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4215850#4215850 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4215850

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Tools (users)] - Re: Hibernate reverse engineering errors

by max.andersen＠jboss.com

hmm - what happens if you remove the attributes with ='' in it ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4215849#4215849 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4215849

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Persistence, JBoss/CMP, Hibernate, Database] - AnnotationConfiguration hacks

by msilva

Hi, We are working on an annotation extension for hibernate and we have 2 problems: 1. this annotation should be only used on transient properties. However we wouldn't like to force users to use @Transient in addition to ours and we don't know how to do it without the required annotation (@Transient) 2. this annotation indicates that another table will be created and it must be mapped with the metadata information of the property annotated. We don't know how to copy this information to the new table. Example: @lob, @version, @temporal etc. We thought about 2 approaches for this: 1. We would let the AnnotationConfiguration parse the property including all of its annotations, then we would copy from the Property class the needed information and afterwards we would delete the original configuration. 2. We wouldn't let the AnnotationConfiguration find this property (somehow) but we would use some inner class or method from hibernate-annotation to parse the annotations. Finally, we would use the parsed information on the new table. Does anybody have a suggestion on how to do it? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4215848#4215848 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4215848

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Cache: Core Edition] - Re: on child insert parent, child collection updated in DB b

by dukehoops

Sorry, premature 'send' of above. Here's missing source code: /** | * | * @param ltesterUserName | * @return current userSession or null | */ | private UserSession getCurrentUserSession(final String ltesterUserName) throws Exception { | | LOG.debug("start getCurrentUserSession method user=" + ltesterUserName); | | try { | return (UserSession) txTemplate.executeWithException(new TransactionCallbackWithException() { | | public Object doInTransactionWithException(TransactionStatus status) throws Exception { | | //add user session, throw exception if one does not exist | | LOG.debug("before findByName user=" + ltesterUserName); | final User usr = getUserDao().findByNameChecked(ltesterUserName); | | LOG.debug("before usr.getCurrentUserSession user=" + ltesterUserName); | final UserSession us = usr.getCurrentUserSession(); | LOG.debug("after usr.getCurrentUserSession user=" + ltesterUserName); | return us; | } | }); | } finally { | LOG.debug("end getCurrentUserSession user=" + ltesterUserName); | } | | } View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4215841#4215841 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4215841

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Installation, Configuration & DEPLOYMENT] - Re: Error during shutdown

by sberlotto

I have the same problem... With RH 4, running OpenJDK on a PowerPc IBM... Anyone ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4215840#4215840 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4215840

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Cache: Core Edition] - Re: on child insert parent, child collection updated in DB b

by dukehoops

REPEATABLE_READ fails with 1 User Now I am even more confused. I just changed jbc isolation from read_committed to repeatable_read and now this test fails with *1* user on the very first iteration: Failure: anonymous wrote : runner for user=ltester-100000 did not complete all iterations; cause=[ThreadId=1] userSession null after successful login; user=ltester-100000 java.lang.IllegalStateException: userSession null after successful login; user=ltester-100000 at com.doppelganger.service.userservice.MultiuserLoginTest.login(MultiuserLoginTest.java:120) Test code: | public void login(final String ltesterUserName) throws Exception { | LOG.debug("begin actual login user=" + ltesterUserName); | | //add userSession | final UserSession us1 = (UserSession) txTemplate.executeWithException(new TransactionCallbackWithException() { | | public Object doInTransactionWithException(TransactionStatus status) throws Exception { | | //add user session, throw exception if one does not exist | LOG.debug("before findByName user=" + ltesterUserName); | final User usr = getUserDao().findByNameChecked(ltesterUserName); | | UserSession userSession = new UserSession(usr); | userSession.setToken(UUID.randomUUID().toString()); | | userSession.setLoginTime(new Timestamp(System.currentTimeMillis())); | userSession.resetSessionTimeout(); //ok here | | //attach userSession to User | LOG.debug("before initCurrentUserSession user=" + ltesterUserName); | usr.initCurrentUserSession(userSession); | LOG.debug("after initCurrentUserSession user=" + ltesterUserName); | | return userSession; | | } | }); | | LOG.debug("end actual login user=" + ltesterUserName); | | //check that we can get at userSession | final UserSession us2 = getCurrentUserSession(ltesterUserName); | | if (us2 == null) { | throw new IllegalStateException("userSession null after successful login; user=" + ltesterUserName); | } | | if (!us1.equals(us2)) { | throw new IllegalStateException("us1 != us2"); | } | } Any ideas? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4215839#4215839 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4215839

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Tools (users)] - Re: H10 plugins left when upgrade to H11

by nickboldt

Updates do not replace, they only add. If you want to replace, uninstall first, then install the updated version. Uninstalling the older R H10 & H11 will also fix the issue that R > N even if the datestamp is newer, so you'll be able to install H15 (and beyond). View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4215837#4215837 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4215837

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user March 2009