[Microcontainer] - Re: Deployers Ordering
by alesj
"richard.opalka(a)jboss.com" wrote :
| * deployer stages have to be comparable
|
Why?
That's why they are called stages and they are already comparable - how else do you think they fit into our state machine. ;-)
"richard.opalka(a)jboss.com" wrote :
| * deployers have to be sorted on deployers chain retrieval (i.e. in method protected synchronized List getDeployersList(String stageName))
|
Why?
Based on what?
This would be complete waste of time/performance.
"richard.opalka(a)jboss.com" wrote :
| * sorting agorithm have to take stages, inputs, outputs and relative order into account
|
Why/how stages?
All the rest is already taken into account.
"richard.opalka(a)jboss.com" wrote :
| * different sorting algorithm have to be implemented (domino is wrong because two deployers are not comparable in general)
Sure.
But re-read my previous post:
"alesj" wrote :
| If we have to resort to name comparison it either means:
| * the order of how we process attachments doesn't matter
| * you are describing/ordering your deployers wrong == lack of info
|
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4239954#4239954
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4239954
17 years