January 2010 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[jBPM] New message: "Re: JBPM 4.3 and JPA/Hibernate integration question"

by Ronald van Kuijk

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "JBPM 4.3 and JPA/Hibernate integration question": http://community.jboss.org/message/523230#523230 Author : Ronald van Kuijk Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kukeltje Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Oh... and: http://docs.jboss.com/jbpm/v4/devguide/html_single/#springIntegration states: > The Spring integration has started out as a community effort by > http://www.inze.be/andries/. > Do note that Spring integration currently is in *'incubation',* before > it is moved to the user guide. > bold is my emphasis. And the doc also states: > Do note that incubation features are not yet considered stable (ie. there > could be major syntax or implementation changes in next versions). > -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/523230#523230

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: JBPM4.3 should be JBPM5.0"

by Ronald van Kuijk

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "JBPM4.3 should be JBPM5.0": http://community.jboss.org/message/523229#523229 Author : Ronald van Kuijk Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kukeltje Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- hahaha, yes I was aware that you were promoting jBPM. The only thing is that your post came out of the blue. It looks like a response to something that is not there. But regarding your statement, let me tell you why I disagree. * BPMN is in incubation.* It is not by a long shot as stable (and spec tested) as jPDL is. * Only a subset of BPMN2 is implemented (expect more in 4.4) * JPDL in jBPM 4 has a lot of room for improvment (see the Jira) * History stuff * additional fork (for-each) * lots of small (not so less visible) improve * ID generator issue * Task closing issues Regarding the releases, the choice was made to have periodical releases so users can depend on that. So expect 4.4 not to be far around the corner. The version where we think BPMN implementation is stable might become jBPM 5 Since the BPMN 2 spec is not even finalized yet, it is not valid to make jBPM already a 5 version (but thanks for the compliment....) Regarding the spring issue, discuss it in the forum and check if there are already Jira issues for it. If not make them after discussing it in the forum first. If there is one, vote for it to give it a 'higher priority' (no guarantee) Cheers, Ronald -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/523229#523229

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: JBPM 4.3 EL cannot read process property with null value"

by Ronald van Kuijk

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "JBPM 4.3 EL cannot read process property with null value": http://community.jboss.org/message/523228#523228 Author : Ronald van Kuijk Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kukeltje Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- What I meant whas that you could have put whatever variable name in the check, it always returns null, even if the variable is not threre at all. Sorry if I formulated that wrongly. So the current behaviour is: || *Case* || *Java* || *EL* || | var exists and has a non-null value | value | value | | var exists and has value of 'null' | null | fails | | var does not exists | null | fails | This should at be identical I think, at least for the case where the variable exists. I created a little patch that solves this (all unit tests still are green). If you file a jira issue about this, I'll attach the patch to it that make EL return null if the variable exists but has a value of null. It does make the last case identical (not it should, and if it should, shoud it fail? or should EL also return null?) Ask that in the Jira issue to. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/523228#523228

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: JBPM 4.3 EL cannot read process property with null value"

by Jakub Sobolewski

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "JBPM 4.3 EL cannot read process property with null value": http://community.jboss.org/message/523226#523226 Author : Jakub Sobolewski Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/jsobolewski Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- There is also statement in test that checks existance of "user_var2" in java after exception is caught. I added this in second zip. if (executionService.getVariableNames(pid).contains("user_var2")) { System.out.println("user_var2 is seen as process var from java code"); } I put it in catch block after EL exception to show that variable exists and you can find and read it from Java. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/523226#523226

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Cache] New message: "Re: Calrification required regarding version of Core Cache"

by Taran Sodhi

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Calrification required regarding version of Core Cache": http://community.jboss.org/message/523225#523225 Author : Taran Sodhi Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/dony908 Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- so doing that would mean changing the getObject and putObject etc methods to attach and xml propertycofigurator etc -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/523225#523225

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Cache] New message: "Re: Jboss Cache clustering in standalone mode"

by Taran Sodhi

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Jboss Cache clustering in standalone mode": http://community.jboss.org/message/523224#523224 Author : Taran Sodhi Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/dony908 Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks, I could see both caches in cluster, as I can put an object and retrieve from another after replication.I have same configuration file for each instance of JBoss cache hosted outside JBoss EAP. But I would like to know how merely having same cluster name for cache can cause 2 seperate instances of cache hosted on seperate boxes talk to each other. Is it something due to JBoss server being started in clustering mode, but remember my cache application is hosted outside EAP as above and it also doesn't have same cluster name as JBoss server. I'm newbie in this field and any pointers are highly appreciated. Many thx in advance, Regards, TS -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/523224#523224

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: JBPM 4.3 EL cannot read process property with null value"

by Ronald van Kuijk

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "JBPM 4.3 EL cannot read process property with null value": http://community.jboss.org/message/523221#523221 Author : Ronald van Kuijk Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kukeltje Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- I'm trying this now, but against 4.4-SNAPSHOT from trunk since Tom has refactored a lot regarding expressions to be CDI compliant -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/523221#523221

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[jBPM] New message: "Re: JBPM 4.3 EL cannot read process property with null value"

by Ronald van Kuijk

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "JBPM 4.3 EL cannot read process property with null value": http://community.jboss.org/message/523219#523219 Author : Ronald van Kuijk Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kukeltje Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- In your test I see no test for this. In fact, the difference between a non-existent variable and one with the value of 'null' is none when retrieving from java. The executionService.getVariable(pi.getId(), "NoneExistentVariable") returns null as well, so null is seen by jBPM as 'none existent'. That is basically the bottom line. I'll try to find out more.So it is not that retrieving the value of a variable with null succeeds ;-) Regarding your test, you can even reduce more. if you use the deployment method in JbpmTestCase, the teardown of the super class does the undeploy automagicallly. And there are also interesting additional assertions. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/523219#523219

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0 Development] New message: "Re: Externalizing Scope: Resolving EJB References and Endpoints"

by Andrew Rubinger

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Externalizing Scope: Resolving EJB References and Endpoints": http://community.jboss.org/message/523218#523218 Author : Andrew Rubinger Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/ALRubinger Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Other uses for easily-consumable injectors: * Arquillian; injects @EJBs * ejb3-mc-int, injects @EJBs into MC Beans * E-EJB3 or the ejb3-core test suite S, ALR -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/523218#523218

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0 Development] New message: "Re: Externalizing Scope: Resolving EJB References and Endpoints"

by Pete Muir

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Externalizing Scope: Resolving EJB References and Endpoints": http://community.jboss.org/message/523217#523217 Author : Pete Muir Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/petemuir Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- The motivation for this is to allow Weld to cluster with EJBs in JBoss AS - currently it won't work. CDI specifies the session and conversations contexts as being passivation capable, both of which are ultimately backed by the HTTP session. The appraoch Weld uses with Managed Beans is to put an object into the HTTP session which references both the Bean (the metadata) and the contextual instance. We take the same approach with EJBs - except that in this case the contextual instance contains not the "real" instance, but a SessionObjectReference which Weld uses to retrieve the underly EJB. I'm not fussed how we solve this problem, whether by changing the way Weld works, or adding something to EJB 3. I don't have a good idea how to change this in Weld tho ;-) -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/523217#523217

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user January 2010