March 2010 - jboss-user - Jboss List Archives

[EJB 3.0 Development] New message: "Re: Externalizing Scope: Resolving EJB References and Endpoints"

by Andrew Rubinger

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Externalizing Scope: Resolving EJB References and Endpoints": http://community.jboss.org/message/530868#530868 Author : Andrew Rubinger Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/ALRubinger Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Looks like it's time to reschedule this in, then. The bigger issues are how we integrate it in with other dependent modules like jboss-metadata-ejb, etc. I'll dig back in starting tomorrow AM and see what estimates I can provide. S, ALR -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/530868#530868

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] New message: "MDB Pool size configuration"

by Brad Warren

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "MDB Pool size configuration": http://community.jboss.org/message/530861#530861 Author : Brad Warren Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/bwarren Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- I'm looking for a definitive answer on configuring the pool size for an MDB. I've seen several conflicting answers between forum posts and documentation, see http://community.jboss.org/thread/147300?tstart=30 Is it the @Pool annotation? http://www.jboss.org/file-access/default/members/jbossejb3/freezone/docs/... {code}(a)Pool(value=PoolDefaults.POOL_IMPLEMENTATION_STRICTMAX,maxSize=50,timeout=1800000){code} Is it the @PoolClass annotation? http://www.jboss.org/ejb3/docs/reference/build/reference/en/html/session-... {code}@PoolClass (value=org.jboss.ejb3.StrictMaxPool.class, maxSize=50, timeout=1800000){code} Is it the MaxPoolSize ActivationConfigProperty? {code} @MessageDriven( activationConfig={ ... @ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName="MaxPoolSize",propertyValue="50") } ) {code} I've also seen a suggestion to change this section in ejb3-interceptors-aop.xml {code:xml} <annotation expr="!class((a)org.jboss.ejb3.annotation.Pool)"> @org.jboss.ejb3.annotation.Pool (value="StrictMaxPool", maxSize=15, timeout=10000) </annotation> {code} But that applies to every MDB. I've also looked at the message-driven-bean invoker-proxy-binding in standardjboss.xml and changing the MaximumSize, but that also applies to every MDB. I've tried the @Pool annotation. I see that MaxPoolSize is 50 in the jmx-console, but if I do a thread dump when there are many thousands of messages backed up in the queue, I only see 15 WorkManager threads processing messages. So what do I need to do to get more than 15 messages processed at once? I'm using JBoss 5.0.1.GA and JBoss Messaging 1.4 -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/530861#530861

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0 Development] New message: "Deferring instance creation/injection to CDI"

by Marius Bogoevici

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Deferring instance creation/injection to CDI": http://community.jboss.org/message/530857#530857 Author : Marius Bogoevici Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/marius.bogoevici Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- There are a number of JIRA items which currently require CDI to be able to intervene in the process of EJB and EJB interceptor instance creation process (these may not be all the items, but : https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELDINT-27 (apply decorators on EJB instances) https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELDINT-9 (perform injection on EJBs directly and not through an interceptor) https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-7046 (perform injection on EJB interceptors) https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELDINT-31 (use @Inject constructors for session EJBs) So the main question at this point is whether there is currently a way to hook Weld into the EJB instantiation process? And if not, then we should probably start discussing this. Thanks, Marius -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/530857#530857

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Portal] New message: "GateIn Support/Consulting"

by Asaf Karpel

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "GateIn Support/Consulting": http://community.jboss.org/message/530856#530856 Author : Asaf Karpel Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/asafkarpel Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi all, We recently started using the GateIn Portal and are looking for a good consulting company to help us get stated and build our initial flow. Any recommendation from personal experience would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Asaf -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/530856#530856

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Web Services] New message: "Client Cert Authentication in 5.1.0"

by dfisher

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Client Cert Authentication in 5.1.0": http://community.jboss.org/message/530855#530855 Author : dfisher Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/dfisher Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- I'm upgrading from version 4.2.3 to 5.1.0 and I'm having trouble getting SSL client authentication and JAAS to work correctly. My session beans are annotated as: @Stateless@SecurityDomain("ClientCertDomain")@WebContext( transportGuarantee = "CONFIDENTIAL", authMethod = "CLIENT-CERT") My login-config.xml contains the following entry: <application-policy name="ClientCertDomain"> <authentication> <login-module code="org.jboss.security.auth.spi.DatabaseCertLoginModule" flag="sufficient"> <module-option name="securityDomain">ClientCertDomain</module-option> ..... </login-module> </authentication> </application-policy> Invocations of the web service fail with: faultString: (401)Unauthorized The logs indicate that the security domain specified in the stateless session bean is "". Application Policy not obtained for domain=. Trying to obtain the App policy for the default domain of the layer:WEB This is apparently related to this bug: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-7037However, I cannot get the workaround to work. Is the best course of action to attempt to update the jars in the JBoss 5.1.0 distribution? Or is there another/better way to configure client cert based authorization? (We can't use WS-Security yet, our clients don't support it.) -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/530855#530855

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] New message: "Re: howto setup jpa using oracle 10g unicode nvarchar2"

by jaikiran pai

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "howto setup jpa using oracle 10g unicode nvarchar2": http://community.jboss.org/message/530851#530851 Author : jaikiran pai Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/jaikiran Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Sorry to jump in late, on this one. The type-mapping is used for the outdated EJB2.x Container Managed Persistence (CMP). It is not used JPA entities. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/530851#530851

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss Microcontainer Development] New message: "Re: JBREFLECT-5 - Implementing generics in JavassistClassInfo"

by Kabir Khan

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "JBREFLECT-5 - Implementing generics in JavassistClassInfo": http://community.jboss.org/message/530850#530850 Author : Kabir Khan Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/kabir.khan@jboss.com Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- > mailto:kabir.khan@jboss.com wrote: > > > 3) When accessing generics from the return type of a method, e.g. > > Collection<String> getStringCollection(){} > > > > we get hold of this method using normal reflection (A) and construct the TypeInfo for that using the ParameterizedType (B1+2) for which I extended the Javassist TypeInfo factory: > > *private* *void* assertComponentType(String methodName, Class<?> expected) *throws* Exception > { > Method method = ClassInfoGenericClassTest.class.getMethod(methodName, (Class[]) *null*); //A > Type type = method.getGenericReturnType(); //B1 > assertComponentType(type, expected); > } > > *private* *void* assertComponentType(Type type, Class<?> expected) *throws* Exception > { > TypeInfoFactory factory = getTypeInfoFactory(); > TypeInfo typeInfo = factory.getTypeInfo(type); //B2 > ClassInfo classInfo = assertInstanceOf(typeInfo, ClassInfo.class); > assertTrue(classInfo.isCollection()); > > TypeInfo expectedInfo = factory.getTypeInfo(expected); > assertEquals(expectedInfo, classInfo.getComponentType()); > } > > > However, that is probably not what will happen in real life, we would have a ClassInfo, get hold of the MethodInfo in question, and then get the return type which should contain the actualTypeArguments. This needs implementing and is not being tested at the moment, and the same goes for parameters and field types. Looking properly, I think what is there at the moment is correct. In reflect we have these additional methods: Type[] Method.getGenericExceptionTypes() Type[] Constructor.getGenericExceptionTypes() Type[] Method.getGenericParameterTypes() Type[] Constructor.getGenericParameterTypes() Type Method.getGenericReturnType() Type Field.getGenericType() The normal non-generic methods (as getReturnType()) simply return a Class. So, I think that MethodInfo.getReturnType() should just return a plain TypeInfo as it does at the moment. I'll concentrate on 1,2 and 4 for now, and see if 3 is needed, although I don't think so since it is not present in the reflect implementation either. -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/530850#530850

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JNDI and Naming] New message: "Re: ConnectionFactory JNDI no found in JNDI view"

by Sridevi KA

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "ConnectionFactory JNDI no found in JNDI view": http://community.jboss.org/message/530849#530849 Author : Sridevi KA Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/sri1083 Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Please some body help me on this...... -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/530849#530849

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0 Development] New message: "Re: Externalizing Scope: Resolving EJB References and Endpoints"

by Marius Bogoevici

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "Externalizing Scope: Resolving EJB References and Endpoints": http://community.jboss.org/message/530847#530847 Author : Marius Bogoevici Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/marius.bogoevici Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Andrew, I think that the API that you're suggesting would work well with JBossSessionObjectReference - so the next question is how quickly can you make it available to be consumed by weld-int? Thanks, Marius -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/530847#530847

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[EJB 3.0] New message: "Re: howto setup jpa using oracle 10g unicode nvarchar2"

by Michael GlÃ¶ckner

User development, A new message was posted in the thread "howto setup jpa using oracle 10g unicode nvarchar2": http://community.jboss.org/message/530844#530844 Author : Michael GlÃ¶ckner Profile : http://community.jboss.org/people/michael.gloeckner Message: -------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Wolfgang, yes I adapted the ds file to my custom type-mapping. But it has been ignored. I also changed it to some wrong type-mapping "Oracle9ixyz" which also has been ignored. Cheers, Micha -------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to this message visit the message page: http://community.jboss.org/message/530844#530844

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-user March 2010