[jboss-user] [jBPM] - Re: rule.ConsequenceException only with JPA

Gary Struthers [http://community.jboss.org/people/GaryS] created the discussion "Re: rule.ConsequenceException only with JPA" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/620458#620458 -------------------------------------------------------------- I made the problem go away but I don't understand why. I have a rule that updates a field in a process variable pojo. rule "applicationReady"     ruleflow-group "assignApplication" when         $process: WorkflowProcessInstance();         $vars :PIvars() from (PIvars)$process.getVariable("vars"); eval($vars.getAppId() == 0);     then     System.out.println("!!Begin firing rule applicationReady " + $vars);        $vars.setApplicationReady(true); #       $process.setVariable("vars", $vars);     System.out.println("!!End firing rule applicationReady"  + $vars); end Commenting out $process.setVariable("vars", $vars); works with both JPA and without. My pojo is inserted as a Fact. Salaboy's example rule "New Ambulance for Heart Attack Emergencies"     ruleflow-group "select_vehicle" when         $process: WorkflowProcessInstance()         Emergency(type == "Heart Attack") from $process.getVariable("emergency") then         System.out.println("A new Ambuance is being created!");         Ambulance ambulance = new Ambulance("MyAmbulance");         ((WorkflowProcessInstance)kcontext.getKnowledgeRuntime().getProcessInstance($process.getId())).setVariable("vehicle", ambulance); insert(ambulance); end Creates a new pojo, where mine just sets a field variable and in my case I'm not sure what is the reliable way to do it. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/620458#620458] Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]