To me this is a bug...
As far as I understand, adding a Runtime action means the action will be executed by the
process instance to which it is added (and this is a great feature!).
The name Runtime comes from the fact it is used by a process instance unlike a process
definition but it does not necessarily mean that the action should be executed in the same
transaction as the one used to add it (to answer to the previous question: Why not to
remove it before persisting...).
Anyway thanks for the fix and I think it will be great to see it fixed in future release
unless I misunderstand the use of Runtime action (then please let me know...).
Arnaud.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4224003#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...