[jboss-user] [JBoss Cache: Core Edition] - Re: How does JBoss Cache perform with high (15-20) number of

"souravm" wrote : All together I've around 250x1000 such entities, which would be replicated across 20 nodes (in about 2-3 mins timeframe). | Do you mean that every node has to store 250MB of data ? By 'replicated' I infer total replication: everyone replicates to everybody else... anonymous wrote : | Now each entity being a size of 1 KB, we have provisioned for 250MB memory at each instance level (that means every node has all the state of the system). Given that I think with increase in number of instances in the cluster, the memory need would not increase. | OK, but then you're not using total replication, I assume 250MB is the total data distributed across the cluster ? anonymous wrote : | My concern is more with the CPU cycles which will go in marshaling/unmarshaling data. Given that every instance would receive data from all other (N-1) instances, the CPU cycles in marshaling the data would grow in all nodes in addition of more nodes in the cluster. | Yes. Note that ispan doesn't use java.io.serialization though, so this is pretty efficient. But, yes, it might still be a perf issue. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4240924#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...