Esteban Aliverti [http://community.jboss.org/people/eaa] created the discussion "Re: Can the human task be action?" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/621182#621182 -------------------------------------------------------------- Why do you want to use Human Tasks if you don't want to use its implementation? If you need to interact with another framework, you can use a Task or even a Script Task.  Maybe I' missing something. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/621182#621182] Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]

Esteban Aliverti [http://community.jboss.org/people/eaa] created the discussion "Re: Can the human task be action?" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/621610#621610 -------------------------------------------------------------- If from the proces point of view, humans needs to be involved, then the best approach would be to use a User Task.  The way you interact with Human Task Server to get the tasks, claim them, complete them, etc. is out of the scope of jbpm5. I mean, you have the api to do all the human task related tasks, but you need to provide your own implementation using them. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/621610#621610] Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]

he jack [http://community.jboss.org/people/jackhe] created the discussion "Re: Can the human task be action?" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/622066#622066 -------------------------------------------------------------- *Thanks very much for Esteban's clear answer.* *I was thinking user task for several days, the task permission can be used by actionId, groupId and * *+Swimlane in jBPM, but our system's+ permission is quite difficult. Now I deciede to design a work flow engineer, actual it is a state machine. The basic theroy is work flow difinition and manager work flow instance state.  The blow is my workflow definition prototype. You maybe see my main idea.* *<workflow id="101" action="issue.do" url="issue.jsp"> <start name="open issue" id=1001>     <to target=1002 command="start progress" commandClass="start.do" url="inprogress.jsp"/>     <to target=1003 command="close issue" commandClass="closeIssue.do" url="done.jsp"/> </start> <state name="in progress" id=1002 >     <to target=1003 command="close issue" commandClass="closeIssue.do" url="done.jsp"/> </state> <end name="close" id=1003> </end> </workflow>*  -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/622066#622066] Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]