Peter Johnson [
https://community.jboss.org/people/peterj] created the discussion
"Re: Options for CMS and G1 Collectors"
To view the discussion, visit:
https://community.jboss.org/message/722530#722530
--------------------------------------------------------------
>I thoguht that it would be a good idea to promote more objects to
tenure and take advantage of the CMS collector.
Actually, this is a bad idea based on testing that i haved done. Two reasons:
1) The pauses during CMS and G1 collections (yes, there are pauses - two of them) are
about as long as the pause caused by minor collection.
2) While CMS and G1 run, they are using up one entire processor/core at 100% because they
are memory and processor intensive. You want those collectors to run as rarely as
possible. If you tenure every object that lives through a minor collection, then you are
going to run CMS/G1 more often and thus will more often lose the use of a core to process
business requests.
See this white paper:
Java Garbage Collection Performance Analysis 201
at
http://www.cmg.org/cgi-bin/search.cgi?q=java+peter+johnson&x=30&y=10
http://www.cmg.org/cgi-bin/search.cgi?q=java+peter+johnson&x=30&y=10
(I worked with a beta version of G1, so take the stability warnings with a grain of salt)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
https://community.jboss.org/message/722530#722530]
Start a new discussion in Performance Tuning at Community
[
https://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]