Tihomir Surdilovic [
http://community.jboss.org/people/tsurdilovic] created the discussion
"Re: two questions about bpmn2 file"
To view the discussion, visit:
http://community.jboss.org/message/645820#645820
--------------------------------------------------------------
Good questions.
> *Q1, The suffix of bpmn2 file is .bpmn2 in the
jbpm-bpmn2-5.2.0.Final-test.jar. but the suffix of bpmn2 files which are created by BPMN2
visual editor is .bpmn?* <<
Both .bpmn and .bpmn2 are valid file extensions and are interchangeable. The runtime can
handle one or the other or both.
> *Q2, In the bpmn2 file of jbpm-bpmn2-5.2.0.Final-test.jar, the
process definition tags don't have any namespace and the files couldn't opened by
visual editor correctly. as below:* <<
The reason for namespaces being added by the jBPM Web Designer is that it uses a different
parser than the Eclipse tooling. Both generate however valid BPMN2. Designer is able to
open processes created in Eclipse and vice versa. If your process for some reason does not
show, the existence or non-existent of namespaces is not the issue, there is something
else going on. Please check the server logs and report back..we'll be happy to try to
help you resolve problems.
As far as which editor to use, that is really your decision given your requirements.
Eclipse editor is targeting developers using Eclipse where as Designer targets both
developers and business users, is web-based and is integrated with Guvnor which brings a
ton of extra features.
Hope this helps.
*
*
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/message/645820#645820]
Start a new discussion in jBPM at Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]