Re: [jbosstools-dev] Xulrunner downgraded for x64 in repository.jboss.org

Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > This should be up to the VPE team to decide. > > I would prefer one version used across the board. > > Why was 1.8.1.4 used instead of 1.8.1.3 ? > Because we weren't able to compile 1.8.1.3 version on x86 platform. /sergey > /max > > >> Hi all: >> >> I've up-loaded a down-graded version of xulrunner over at >> http://repository.jboss.org/xulrunner/ >> >> The reason for this is so that we may (if it's not impossible) use a >> matching xulrunner release across all jbds and jbosstools releases. >> Previously, the x64 release was 1.8.1.4 rather than the standard 1.8.1.3 >> used in windows, linux, and osx. >> >> Whether this can be worked into the build for 2.1.0 GA, or the update >> site, or not, remains to be seen. But I just wanted to make sure this is >> a possibility for GA. Personally, *I* hope it makes it in... but with >> the xulrunner version being technically lower than the old, anyone >> already using the product would have to manually downgrade the file in >> the plugins folder. Not exactly a great situation. >> >> Parity? Or ease of use? Which will win? >> >> - Rob Stryker >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >