AFAIK there were multiple plans in place. One minimalist one, and one
with a different set of urgent things to fix.
Max specifically asked that JBDS-2218, 2219, 2220, and 2221 get done
while he was AFK on PTO, but then later said we should only do the
smaller set. So, to resolve this conflicting direction, I went with the
superset.
---
As to uping versions of 3rd party plugins, that will have to slip to 5.0.2.
I've been waiting on feedback on these for at least a month:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11167 GWT VE & WB 2.5.x/2.6.x
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-2187 GWT 2.5.x/2.6.x
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-1998 subclipse 1.8
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-2001 egit 1.3
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-2032 testng 6.4
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-2166 findbugs 2.0.1
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-1627 jslint 1.5
Once they're accepted by QE I can push them into JBDS, but I need your
authorization to do so first. Note too that there's now a GWT 3.0.1 for
both Eclipse 3.7 and 4.2, which will ALSO need vetting - see
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBDS-2235 for that one - need to decide
if we want 3.0.1 in JBDS 5 and 6, or just 6. Since 3.0.1 is the first
version I found that supports Juno, I've added it to the reqs mirror and
TP in advance of your approvals simply because it's the only version
available. Should you deem it unacceptable, I'll of course remove it.
Cheers,
Nick
On 07/11/2012 05:53 PM, Len DiMaggio wrote:
Greetings from Prague everyone,
This plan sounds good - but - I thought that the plan for 5.0.1/3.3.1
was to fix these bugs, and no others?
/
/
/> JBIDE-12249, A lot of failures to install from
marketplace.eclipse.org
> JBIDE-12248, JBoss Tools (Indigo) Installation from Eclipse Marketplace
> fails for Eclipse Indigo 3.7.0 and 3.7.1
>
> Are we also up-ing the versions of some 3rd party plugins?
> JBDS-2212, audit version numbers of features/plugins in JBDS 5.0.0 vs.
> 4.1.3/
The release seems to have grown quite a bit from this list.
-- Len
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Jiri Peterka" <jpeterka(a)redhat.com>
*To: *"Nick Boldt" <nboldt(a)redhat.com>
*Cc: *"jbds-pm-list" <jbds-pm-list(a)redhat.com>,
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org, external-exadel-list(a)redhat.com
*Sent: *Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:22:36 PM
*Subject: *Re: 3.3.1 / 5.0.1 - more JIRAs coming / latest respin
almost done
Deal. We'll finish CR1a testing until end of Friday, please respin
to GA
on Sunday if no blockers are reported until end of Friday. No CR1b
build will be done, I'll move rest of unresolved JIRAs to 3.3.2.
Thanks, Jirka
On 07/11/2012 06:01 PM, Nick Boldt wrote:
> Agree on all counts but this was a super-short runway (due to my PTO
> starting July 18), and not all the issues we wanted done for
Friday's
> code freeze were done in time.
>
> So, yeah, non-ideal and we'll try to do better for the .2
maintenance
> next time around (prolly in September, depending on when 6.0.0.M1
gets
> scheduled.
>
> I'll hold off providing you a CR1b, and we can just respin as GA on
> Sunday, unless you want me to wait until Monday night?
>
> On 07/11/2012 04:07 AM, Jiri Peterka wrote:
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> if there is a new respin for these, it's not possible to perform new
>> build re-test in time (this week). For small-mid versions like 5.0.1
>> expected procedure is:
>>
>> 1. All issues in JIRA for 3.3.1 are fixed first or postponed
>> 2. Then QE Build for is delivered
>> 3. QE is testing a build (we need 1 week approximately for a
build) - no
>> more new JIRA fixes during this period!
>> 4. If non-trivial tests pass, then sign-off & 1:1 respin to GA,
if not
>> then new JIRAs are created and we are back at step 1
>> 5. GA is put to CSP and basic verification is done by QE
>>
>> Currently we almost break all those rules which is not good for
smooth
>> testing process. I know there are be PTO & other planning
reasons. Still
>> we definitely need to avoid similar situations next time. Mainly
step 1
>> was not fulfilled and not all JIRAs has been fixed or postponed
first
>> and some fixes are still coming under QA phase. For QE it's really
>> impossible to use a new build several times in one week and provide
>> consistent testing and test results. And another expectation that is
>> valid for small-mid updates is that dev phase on branch is done
when QE
>> build is coming.
>>
>> Thanks for understanding, regards,
>>
>> Jirka
>>
>> On 07/11/2012 04:27 AM, Nick Boldt wrote:
>>> Just a heads up that a few more issues have been added to the
.1 pile.
>>>
>>> == UNRESOLVED ==
>>>
>>> JBIDE-12299 : Widen dependency range to support Mylyn 3.8
>>>
>>>
>>> == RESOLVED, NEEDS VERIFICATION ==
>>>
>>> JBIDE-12273 : The Source Lookup plugin is not compatible with
m2e 1.1
>>> (m2e Juno)
>>>
>>> JBIDE-12111 : dynamically set the maven-compiler-plugin for seam
>>> projects, in order to avoid constraint violation occurring when
>>> mavenizing seam 2.3 projects
>>>
>>> JBIDE-12207 : Bump default Seam version in the JBoss Maven Facet
>>> wizard page
>>>
>>> JBIDE-11310 : resetting models when user switches the openshift
user
>>>
>>> JBDS-2219, JBDS-2220, JBDS-2221 : central connector tweaks for
mylyn
>>>
>>>
>>> == VERIFIED CLOSED ==
>>>
>>> JBDS-2218 : add eclipse-cs to Central
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Looks like the affected components have all built and now we're
just
>>> waiting on the new updatesite/installer build for JBDS to finish.
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
Len DiMaggio (ldimaggi(a)redhat.com)
JBoss by Red Hat
314 Littleton Road
Westford, MA 01886 USA
tel: 978.392.3179
cell: 781.472.9912
http://www.redhat.com
http://community.jboss.org/people/ldimaggio
<
http://www.redhat.com>
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com