Re: [jbosstools-dev] For the Record

The relevance is that when I was suggesting to Max to refactor much code into a generic WTP extenders project, rather than keeping it in the AS plugin, one argument to keep the code in my plugin was that my plugin has no dependencies and can be downloaded standalone. It can't, really. It requires JMX and archives. This means I would be more in favor of creation of some core / wtp-extension plugin to keep abstract or otherwise useful classes for our distro. Again, this would mean that AS Tools would require an additional download, but as we currently require archives and jmx, I don't think this would be an issue.

John Graham wrote: > Sorry: missing context for this... > > And so this means? > > On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 11:21 +0800, Rob Stryker wrote: >> max: >> >> For the record, you already cannot download standalone AS Tools >> without errors. >> >> It requires Archives and JMX. >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev