I did as Denis suggested - put a x- in front of the "dead" ones and
updated the filter.
Shortly after I realized you can actually just sort by Last success and
get the dead ones in the bottom automatically....
In any case now the "dead" ones are marked and I think we should do a
quick scan at the conf call today and remove the really dead ones
since the list is still hard to grasp.
/max
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
Denis Golovin wrote:
> That's a new group and we have enough groups on hudson :)
I never look at the front page - I just have direct bookmarks to the
relevant groups...
> Why would we just keep them the at the bottom of DevStudio group by
> giving them right prefix, like 'x-' or something meaningful?
That would probably work too - will try do that when ever I get a
stable connection to hudson.
/max
> Denis
>
> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I thought I had a good hudson connection today but of course it
>> stopped working halfway through my "experiment" so
>> I guess the best thing I can do is let you know up front so you
>> don't start screaming over "missing" builds.
>>
>> I went and created a "DevStudio Dormant" hudson group and started
>> adding "dormant-" to all builds that haven't been used for months.
>>
>> It worked well until hudson stopped working - when I get a working
>> connection again I'll continue the cleanup.
>>
>> Is the "Dormant" split a Good or Bad idea ? The idea is to make the
>> "primary" group actually list relevant builds.
>>
>> /max
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev