Re: [jbosstools-dev] Hudson cleanup (Attempt 1)
Denis Golovin wrote:
That's a new group and we have enough groups on hudson :)
I never look at the front page - I just have direct bookmarks to the
relevant groups...
Why would we just keep them the at the bottom of DevStudio group by
giving them right prefix, like 'x-' or something meaningful?
That would
probably work too - will try do that when ever I get a stable
connection to hudson.
/max
Denis
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thought I had a good hudson connection today but of course it
> stopped working halfway through my "experiment" so
> I guess the best thing I can do is let you know up front so you don't
> start screaming over "missing" builds.
>
> I went and created a "DevStudio Dormant" hudson group and started
> adding "dormant-" to all builds that haven't been used for months.
>
> It worked well until hudson stopped working - when I get a working
> connection again I'll continue the cleanup.
>
> Is the "Dormant" split a Good or Bad idea ? The idea is to make the
> "primary" group actually list relevant builds.
>
> /max
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev