I just noticed http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137029#... which asks how users should commit their projects to svn/cvs when our .settings files contains hardcoded file references. I did not think we still had this so it becomes a very good question. How did Exadel do this with Exadel studio ? /max _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev

> That's related to http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-1820. I fully > agree and information loaded form org.jboss.tools.jst.web.xml should be > collected from java/facet. I asked Slava to look at it. > Until now I thought we were just duplicating the list of jar deps and source folders, but I did not realize we were using fully specified filesystem specific paths. That is really really bad.

That is why i'm interested in hearing how exadel studio users were recommended to workaround this issue (since I assume it was also an issue in exadel studio) -max > Thanks, > Denis > > Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > >> I just noticed http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137029#... which >> asks how users should commit their projects to svn/cvs when our .settings files contains >> hardcoded file references. >> >> I did not think we still had this so it becomes a very good question. >> >> How did Exadel do this with Exadel studio ? >> >> /max >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> >> >

So why is users reporting there being filesystem specific references ? e.g. what if a jar is from outside the workspace?

That is why i'm interested in hearing how exadel studio users were recommended to workaround this issue (since I assume it was also an issue in exadel studio)

>> Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> >>> I just noticed

>>> asks how users should commit their projects to svn/cvs when our

>>> hardcoded file references. >>> >>> I did not think we still had this so it becomes a very good question. >>> >>> How did Exadel do this with Exadel studio ? >>> >>> /max >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>> >>> >> > > > >

>> That is why i'm interested in hearing how exadel studio users >> were recommended to workaround >> this issue (since I assume it was also an issue in exadel studio) > > I think there could be no other recommendation than to adjust > the project in 'Modules Configuration' dialog. What does that mean ? Which modules configuration dialog ?

> I still can't find that dialog...where should I go to find it ? :) In 'Web Projects' view: On Struts project node "JBoss Tools Struts/Modules Configuration" In 'Package Explorer' view: On Struts project node "JBoss Tools/Modules Configuration" Slava ----- Original Message ----- From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen(a)redhat.com>; "Viacheslav Kabanovich" <scabanovich(a)exadel.com>; "Denis Golovin" <dgolovin(a)exadel.com&gt; Cc: <jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>; <external-exadel-list(a)redhat.com&gt; Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 4:10 PM Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] physical bound file names in .settings directories ? > On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:23:06 +0100, Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > >>> That is why i'm interested in hearing how exadel studio users > >>> were recommended to workaround > >>> this issue (since I assume it was also an issue in exadel studio) > >> > >> I think there could be no other recommendation than to adjust > >> the project in 'Modules Configuration' dialog. > > > > What does that mean ? Which modules configuration dialog ? > > I still can't find that dialog...where should I go to find it ? :) > > /max

> For JSF projects, solving JBIDE-1714, I have eliminated file /.settings/org.jbosstools.jst.web.xml > so it is not a problem anymore. > okey...then I have questions for that: do we still work with users existing workspaces having that file ? (we must)

do we still work with non-WTP projects ? (we must)

What information does org.jbosstools.jst.web.xml represent ? It is more than just the jar dependencies right? > For Struts projects dependency of Studio implementation on this file is rather strong > so that eliminating it would require some extensive refactoring. Do we need to solve > the problem for Struts, nevertheless, or is not it worth efforts? > If struts is completely seperate from this then lets first focus on JSF - I haven't seen anyone report back on Struts. -max > Slava > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: <jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > Cc: "Viacheslav Kabanovich" <scabanovich(a)exadel.com>; <external-exadel-list(a)redhat.com&gt; > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 8:07 PM > Subject: physical bound file names in .settings directories ? > > > I just noticed http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137029#... which > asks how users should commit their projects to svn/cvs when our .settings files contains > hardcoded file references. > > I did not think we still had this so it becomes a very good question. > > How did Exadel do this with Exadel studio ? > > /max > >

>> do we still work with non-WTP projects ? (we must) >> > It has not been working without WTP natures before. Because if you add > JSF/Struts capabilities it adds all necessary WTP features.

I'm referring to I can open files in non wtp projects and the editors

Before I assume it just ignored that there were no .settings info for it

want to be sure it now does not assume it will be in an WTP project.

>> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen(a)redhat.com&gt; >> To: <jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; >> Cc: "Viacheslav Kabanovich" <scabanovich(a)exadel.com>;

>> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 8:07 PM >> Subject: physical bound file names in .settings directories ? >> >> >> I just noticed

>> asks how users should commit their projects to svn/cvs when our

>> hardcoded file references. >> >> I did not think we still had this so it becomes a very good question. >> >> How did Exadel do this with Exadel studio ? >> >> /max >> >> > > > > >

> do we still work with users existing workspaces having that file ? (we must) Yes, if that file is found it is used. What is new is that the file can be removed without any harm. > do we still work with non-WTP projects ? (we must) We have already been working with Seam java projects without creating this file. > What information does org.jbosstools.jst.web.xml represent ? > It is more than just the jar dependencies right? Yes, it contains information about web modules. First, it was implemented in Struts, and our specification required to support references to any location on disk for struts-config.xml, module root folders, java src folder, etc. That is why Struts is so dependent on our xml file and that is why paths are absolute. Dialog "Modules Configuration" illustrates the dependency. Later, when JSF was developed, no support for such an elaborate dependency was provided, instead, auto-restoring references by analyzing web.xml was implemented. That is, JSF implementation was more prepared to dismiss that xml, by addressing WTP in the algorithm for restoring references. > If struts is completely seperate from this then lets first focus on JSF - > I haven't seen anyone report back on Struts. Then, with that stipulation, I think, JBIDE-1714 and JBIDE-1820 are fixed. Slava > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: <jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > Cc: "Viacheslav Kabanovich" <scabanovich(a)exadel.com>; <external-exadel-list(a)redhat.com&gt; > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 8:07 PM > Subject: physical bound file names in .settings directories ? > > > I just noticed http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137029#... which > asks how users should commit their projects to svn/cvs when our .settings files contains > hardcoded file references. > > I did not think we still had this so it becomes a very good question. > > How did Exadel do this with Exadel studio ? > > /max >