> Should JBoss Guvnor Tools Plug-in have JBoss.org Provider name or it > it should have JBoss, a Division of Red Hat? > > >

>> So, JBoss Tools 3.0.0.GA and JBDS 2.0.0.GA should contain >> DroolsIDE-5.0.0.GA and JBoss.org will be Provider name for JBoss >> Guvnor Tools Plug-in, right? >> Anton, I'm not sure if JBDS 2.0.0 GA will bundle Drools 5 CR1 or Drools 5 GA, but in either case this change in the Guvnor tools provider text will be present. -- John On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 16:58 +0200, Anton Klimkovich wrote: > Hello John, > > So, JBoss Tools 3.0.0.GA and JBDS 2.0.0.GA should contain > DroolsIDE-5.0.0.GA and JBoss.org will be Provider name for JBoss > Guvnor Tools Plug-in, right? > > Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 4:52:18 PM, you wrote: > > John> It should be JBoss, a division of Red Hat. That change has been make in > John> the Drools 5 code base, and we'll pick it up with the next Drools 5 > John> milestone. > > John> -- John > > John> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 16:36 +0200, Anton Klimkovich wrote: > >>> Should JBoss Guvnor Tools Plug-in have JBoss.org Provider name or it >>> it should have JBoss, a Division of Red Hat? >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > > _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev