January 2009 - jbpm-dev - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - any jbpm version for java 1.4 ?

by tangomannn

Hi, Is there any jbpm version for java 1.4.2? The doc for version 3 says that is for java 1.4.2 (http://docs.jboss.org/jbpm/v3/userguide/deployment.html ) but I downloaded the source and I found that they're using annotations ... I would just need a jbpm-jpdl.jar and jbpm-identity.jar that runs on java 1.4.2 , if someone can help me, my email is frequena at gmail com Any help would be nice. I developed an application thinking that the minimun requirement was java 1.4, as the doc said, but now I just found that is for java 1.5 thank you very much, in advance. Fernando View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4204702#4204702 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4204702

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Populating DropDown list from database in the Task form

by giridhar_be

Hi All, I want to populate dropdown list values from database table in the Task form. I know how to do in the JSF, first we have to declare Manage Bean in the faces-config.xml and use selectManyMenu for display. Bean will extract data from database that returns list of values. In JBPM processdefinition how to do this.? There is no faces-config.xml file when we created new processdefnition. One way is I have to edit faces-config.xml in the jbpm-console.war; Is there any otherway I can do this task. Extracting data from databse and showing those values in drop down list in the JBPM Task form. Thanks in advance... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4204684#4204684 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4204684

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: BPMN in jbpm4

by camunda

Some additional remarks on the GPD (I think they are already on your list, I just wanted to write it down here, since I made these notes): - line break should be supported in activities to allow to model from left to right - Labels should be shown on Gateways (to see the condition) - Free labels would be quite nice as well :-) - Drawing a flow to an activity itself is not possible at the moment (or I was too dumb for it) - XML-View as tab in GPD is really missing! - Property Editing is still missing And for flows one additional remark: default and conditional flows could also be visualized according to BPMN spec, that would be really cool :-) Cheers Bernd View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4204521#4204521 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4204521

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Java Activity not using Interface

by camunda

Hi. The java activity in jbpm 4 uses a normal Java class, not like in jbpm 3 an Interface (ActionHandler). I am missing the interface a bit, even if this solution is also a nice addition. And Implementing Java-Logic in a Activity itself requires to add this special "ActionHandler" as own activity type, which is not what I want. It would be a good improvement to add the possibility for an handler in the java activity like in jbpm3. Or is this already planned? Or why not doing it? Thanks Bernd View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4204520#4204520 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4204520

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - BPMN in jbpm4

by camunda

Hi. Currently I port a sample process to jbpm4, so I play around with it a bit. I also prepare a blog entry for demonstrating it. First of all: Nice looking Designer! Good job :-)) But I have some issues and questions with the BPMN used in jbpm 4: Violation of Spec - Multiple leaving flows in a activity with XOR semantic. This is not BPMN, BPMN has AND semantic but allows for conditions on the outgoing flows. The behaviour implemented makes sense if you know jPDL, but it is not correct BPMN. I think this is somehow problematic - End which terminates Executiuon only. For this end the End-Event should be used, not the Termination-Event (which is only a signle circle). With the termination event BPMN specifies that the whole process instance is terminated. Missing stuff A lot of stuff is still missing: Attached events, Pools, Lanes, a lot of events (like message, compensating, ...). The question here is: To what extend will the missing features be implemented? Is this one of the goals? Or not? I am not currently up to date here, maybe I had to leave Antwerp to soon :-/ Will spec-conformability be targeted? Or is BPMN more for nice looking diagrams and marketing? Would be interessting to hear some oppinions and directions, because these are things people start asking me, and as giving BPMN trainings and working together with research on BPMN topics we (camunda) are in duty to know correct BPD's and not misusing BPMN as drawing tool ;-) Thanks a lot and have a nice weekend Bernd View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4204519#4204519 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4204519

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: jbpm 4 - Term

by camunda

Damn forum, shortened the subject again :-/ View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4204412#4204412 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4204412

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - jbpm 4 - Term

by camunda

HI. First of all one easy question: Feedback about jbpm 4 and discussions will go on in this forum, right? Or PVM? One thing Thomas already wrote which I lso think about: What about the term "execution"? This somehow replaced the "token", but I am not sure if that is a good idea. ProcessInstance and Token was more or less easy to explain and straight forward. Execution is not that clear... So I would like to see ProcessInstance and Token again, but I think that would cause a lot refactoring. What are your thoughts? Or is it decided already anyway? Cheers Bernd View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4204411#4204411 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4204411

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Any possibility of persistence-API?

by camunda

+1 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4204407#4204407 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4204407

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Any possibility of persistence-API?

by alex.guizar＠jboss.com

Indeed. JPA should be the intersection. I missed the Hibernate, JPA, iBatis bit. An abstraction layer on top of JPA would be a crime :-) We agreed on JPA back in Antwerp if I recall correctly. No mention was made about who or when, tough. I would not mind, but the short term priorities are elsewhere. In any case it has to be there before GA, otherwise it will be impossible to switch later. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4204406#4204406 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4204406

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Any possibility of persistence-API?

by camunda

But it should be JPA, not a own abstraction... And I think it was agreed to use JPA in jbpm 4 unless we find any real showstopper? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4204391#4204391 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4204391

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

jbpm-dev January 2009