March 2009 - jbpm-dev - Jboss List Archives

by Thomas Diesler

Koen, could you please discuss the impact of these changes with Trevor? Perhaps you can comment on the forum http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214404 cheers -thomas trevor kirby wrote: > Thomas Diesler wrote: >> Hi Trevor, >> >> today, I noticed a potential issue with possibly incompatible GPD >> files in jbpm-3.2.5.SP2 >> >> http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214404#4214404 >> >> It seems that the example GPD files that are shipped in jbpm-3.2.5.SP2 >> are not verified with the GPD version from that release. >> >> Do you actually do some GPD backwards compatibility checking? > We do not, JBDS handles the tooling aspect, Max or John Graham are the > guys to ask. Do you have upgrade scripts if needed? I don't know if you > guys are aware of the platform rules, but we are not meant to make > compatibility changes in a release. We are meant to make compatibility > changes only in a major release. > >> "A Cumulative Patch is an incremental update to a release that fixes >> known issues. CPs do not deprecate existing or introduce new features. >> The only exception being features that are minor, non-default and >> non-intrusive. Any such exception must be approved by Engineering and >> Product Management and clearly documented in the release notes." >> >> JBoss Release Taxonomy, 1.0, >> https://docspace.corp.redhat.com/clearspace/docs/DOC-6430 > Trev >> >> cheers >> -thomas >> > -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thomas Diesler BPM Product Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Contributing back to the jBPM community - business calen

by baobab

And 6h, don't post replies after drug. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214438#4214438 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214438

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

GPD file format change

by Thomas Diesler

Hi Trevor, today, I noticed a potential issue with possibly incompatible GPD files in jbpm-3.2.5.SP2 http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214404#4214404 It seems that the example GPD files that are shipped in jbpm-3.2.5.SP2 are not verified with the GPD version from that release. Do you actually do some GPD backwards compatibility checking? cheers -thomas -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thomas Diesler BPM Product Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Incompatible GPD files

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

When did the format change? Are you saying that SOA customers won't be able to use their existing GPD files with 3.2.5.SP2 nor jbpm-3.2.6.GA? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214404#4214404 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214404

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Invalid JSF-Console release

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Alejandro sais, anonymous wrote : | I created a 3.2.6.GA branch for the jsf-console, fixed a broken ejb-ref | in jboss-web.xml and set the version numbers in the poms appropriately. | | I took the console for a test drive with the websale process and it | works just fine. As soon as Hudson completes, it should be ready to fly. | | We did not agree on who would release it. If any of you does it, would | you please document your steps so I can do it in the future? | I verified that this is ok and will recreate the tag from it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214401#4214401 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214401

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Invalid JSF-Console release

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Folks, the jbpm-3.2.6 build fails because it references a jsf-console that is not released | <jbpm.jsf-console.version>3.2.6.GA</jbpm.jsf-console.version> | | [tdiesler@tddell jbpm3]$ ls -1 jsf-console | 3.2.2.GA | 3.3.0.GA | 3.3.1.GA | There is a tag for jsf-console-3.2.6.GA but it actually has a different version and references a 3.3.1-SNAPSHOT which is not used any more | [tdiesler@tddell jsf-console-3.2.6.GA]$ find . -name pom.xml | xargs grep SNAPSHOT | ./pom.xml: <version>3.3.1-SNAPSHOT</version> | ./pom.xml: <jbpm.version>3.3.1-SNAPSHOT</jbpm.version> | ./console/pom.xml: <version>3.3.1-SNAPSHOT</version> | ./jbpm4jsf/pom.xml: <version>3.3.1-SNAPSHOT</version> | ./soa/pom.xml: <version>3.3.1-SNAPSHOT</version> | The hudson box has been hacked to to contain that version. Why? | [hudson@jbpm ~]$ ls -1 ~/.m2/repository/org/jbpm/jbpm3/jsf-console | 3.2.6.GA | 3.3.0.GA | 3.3.1.GA | 3.3.1-SNAPSHOT | All of this is happening at a point of time were we are trying to wrap up a release. Can you please explain what is going on and why do see these unsolicited changes in the first place. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214395#4214395 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214395

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Incompatible GPD files

by alex.guizar＠jboss.com

The format changed between the 3.0 and the 3.1 branches of the GPD, not of jPDL. The 3.1 branch has been out for quite a while. I found several outdated GPD files while looking for an example to deploy and decided to accept the conversion to the "new" format. The GPD files do not even take part in the automated tests - they just contain layout metadata for the designer (and the process image page in the console). Nothing new here, just something that should probably have been done when the new format was introduced. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214392#4214392 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214392

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Incompatible GPD files

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Folks, I noticed that the GPD example files in 3.2.6 were updated to some new format convert example GPD files to 3.1.x format http://fisheye.jboss.com/changelog/JbpmSvn/?cs=4101 This would be an incompatible change and cannot be done in 3.2.x Alejandr, Koen could you please comment? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214386#4214386 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214386

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Contributing back to the jBPM community - business calen

by kukeltje

A reply... but probably not the one you want :-) First of all, this is a forum for discussing functionality of jBPM for people working ON jBPM, not with jBPM. Secondly, It is not a forum to request solutions. Thirdly, if it is urgent, buy commercial support (but I think only consultancy will help) or hire a java developer, 4th, there was a weekend in between... people do take a rest sometimes. 5th, you 'abuse' a 1.5 year old post. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214310#4214310 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214310

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Contributing back to the jBPM community - business calen

by baobab

Guys, any reply? Need urgent!!! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214225#4214225 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214225

15 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

jbpm-dev March 2009