March 2009 - jbpm-dev - Jboss List Archives

Re: [jbpm-dev] jbpm-3.2.6.GA QA branch created

by Thomas Diesler

Hi Koen, > SOA should take it for a test run. Can you wait on this go-nogo before > releasing? The SOA platform uses 3.2.5.SP2 and does currently not have a dependency on 3.2.6 - so GPD-3.1.7 it is not a blocker for 3.2.6 > Another pending issue with GPD 3.1.x is the securing of the deployment > servlet. The simple workaround is to add a second servlet definition in > the web.xml that is not secured. Can this workaround still be added? Please discuss this with Heiko, as he owns the jsf console. jbpm-3.2.6 did not see an update of the jsf-console and there was no issue raised to do so. This can be looked at again in 3.2.7 > I am sorry to be this late What can I say? AFAIK, you did not really look into gpd3 issues until after code freeze. So this should hardly come as a surprise. Please have a look at this document again http://www.jboss.org/community/docs/DOC-13217 A well documented release schedule is supposed to help everybody to schedule and manage their respective work load in a reliable way. Jira Freeze for GPD-3.1.7 was 11-Jan-2009. This was the date you committed yourself to resolve 6 issues until Code Freeze 15-Feb-2009. After Code Freeze there would have been two more weeks to address integration issues if there should be any. As it stands now, I would include GPD-3.1.7 in jBPM-3.2.6 if is ready before Alejandro has fixed the (last two) remaining regression issues. If the SOA platform needs it, there would have to be an 3.2.5.SP3. The community may have to wait until 3.2.7. cheers -thomas Koen Aers wrote: > Thomas, > > I have uploaded a new build of the gpd to the snapshot repository > (http://snapshots.jboss.org/maven2/org/jbpm/jbpm3/jbpm-gpd/3.1.7-SNAPSHOT/). > It contains a fix for GPD-298 which was unscheduled but urged for by > Max. I think that the fix should work, but to be 100% sure the guys from > SOA should take it for a test run. Can you wait on this go-nogo before > releasing? > Another pending issue with GPD 3.1.x is the securing of the deployment > servlet. The simple workaround is to add a second servlet definition in > the web.xml that is not secured. Can this workaround still be added? > > (I am sorry to be this late, but I was really tied up with the sibling > release of 4.0.0.alpha2 last week.) > > Cheers, > Koen > > Op 28-feb-09, om 13:11 heeft Thomas Diesler het volgende geschreven: > >> Hi Folks, >> >> I created the jbpm-3.2.6.GA QA branch >> >> https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbpm/jbpm3/branches/jbpm-3.2.6.GA/ >> >> The Hudson QA is here >> >> http://jbpm.dyndns.org:8280/hudson/job/jBPM326-Container-Matrix/ >> http://jbpm.dyndns.org:8280/hudson/job/jBPM326-Database-Matrix/ >> >> Please only commit stuff that fixes regression. >> >> cheers >> -thomas >> _______________________________________________ >> jbpm-dev mailing list >> jbpm-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbpm-dev > -- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thomas Diesler BPM Product Lead JBoss, a division of Red Hat xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: oryx and jbpm

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

OK, I've setup a doodle. Please take your pick: http://doodle.com/eichevkdygcxpp7f View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214157#4214157 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214157

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Job.configuration property

by camunda

Perfect. jBPM is always one step ahead :-)) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214099#4214099 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214099

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Services -changed from List to Set

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

ordering of services is crucial ! good that you put it back. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214098#4214098 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214098

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Job.configuration property

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

i don't recall this. but i assume it is probably for some kind of extensibility like bernd needs it for :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214097#4214097 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214097

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Removed Timer/autosave in Revision 4006?

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Bernd, please clone the issue or create a new one. Generally you cannot commit stuff to an already closed issue - if there is still stuff to do there must be an unresolved issue for it. This is important for documentation purposes in the release notes. To preserve issue association they can be linked to each other. anonymous wrote : | I'll dig on this a bit more in 3.2.7 | If there is an issue, please create one. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214095#4214095 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214095

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Removed Timer/autosave in Revision 4006?

by alex.guizar＠jboss.com

Each job subclass registers the process instance for autosave, as in your fix for JBPM-1015. I removed the redundant calls to jbpmContext.save() that had been left over. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4214060#4214060 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4214060

15 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

jbpm-dev March 2009