March 2009 - jbpm-dev - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - trunk is failing

by ainze

Hi there, I'm getting following exception when running any test from trunk that involves deploying jpdl: | org.jbpm.JbpmException: problems during deployment: errors: | | error: couldn't parse xml document : java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: When using array of Objects as the value of SCHEMA_SOURCE property , no two Schemas should share the same targetNamespace. | error: couldn't interpret the dom model: null : java.lang.NullPointerException | at org.jbpm.pvm.internal.deploy.CheckProblemsDeployer.deploy(CheckProblemsDeployer.java:48) | at org.jbpm.pvm.internal.deploy.DeployerManager.deploy(DeployerManager.java:61) | at org.jbpm.pvm.internal.cmd.DeployCmd.execute(DeployCmd.java:54) | at org.jbpm.pvm.internal.cmd.DeployCmd.execute(DeployCmd.java:1) | at org.jbpm.pvm.internal.svc.DefaultCommandService.execute(DefaultCommandService.java:42) | at org.jbpm.pvm.internal.tx.StandardTransactionInterceptor.execute(StandardTransactionInterceptor.java:54) | at org.jbpm.pvm.internal.svc.EnvironmentInterceptor.execute(EnvironmentInterceptor.java:54) | at org.jbpm.pvm.internal.svc.RetryInterceptor.execute(RetryInterceptor.java:52) | at org.jbpm.pvm.internal.svc.ProcessServiceImpl.deploy(ProcessServiceImpl.java:84) | at org.jbpm.pvm.internal.svc.DeploymentImpl.deploy(DeploymentImpl.java:279) | at org.jbpm.test.JbpmTestCase.deployJpdlXmlString(JbpmTestCase.java:137) | at org.jbpm.test.execution.StartExecutionTest.testStartNewExecutionByKey(StartExecutionTest.java:40) | at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) | at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) | at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) | at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) | at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:154) | at org.jbpm.test.BaseJbpmTestCase.runTest(BaseJbpmTestCase.java:81) | at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127) | at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106) | at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124) | at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109) | at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118) | at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208) | at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203) | at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.junit3.JUnit3TestReference.run(JUnit3TestReference.java:130) | at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38) | at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:460) | at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:673) | at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:386) | at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:196) | | I'm looking into the problem, but can't find a real cause. Does anyone recognise this error? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4220432#4220432 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4220432

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Task Management component?

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

thanks ! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4219730#4219730 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4219730

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Task Management component?

by aapthorp

jBPM iCalendar wrapper available...at last. At long last I've managed to package up and make available a working release of the iCalendar wrapper...which I'm calling taskcal. https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=256581 I'm making this version available to validate the concepts. More work is required (e.g. authentication) for this to be turned in to a production system. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4219653#4219653 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4219653

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Confused about versioning

by mauromol

"kukeltje" wrote : From what I know there is no functional and api difference between 3.2.x and 3.3.x, so you should be able to use 3.2.x from now on. The only difference was the console afaik.... Actually, these are the differences I could remember: - the DB schema for 3.3.x has one more column in JBPM_NODE than that of 3.2.x (column PARENTLOCKMODE_) - some methods were refactorized from 3.2.2 to 3.3.0: for instance org.jbpm.util.ClassLoaderUtil.getProcessClassLoader(ProcessDefinition) was moved to org.jbpm.JbpmConfiguration.getProcessClassLoader(ProcessDefinition) Unless a "rollback" or a compatibility enhancement between 3.2.x and 3.3.x has been performed, it is not really true that there are no differences between the two branches except for the GWTConsole... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4219393#4219393 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4219393

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Confused about versioning

by kukeltje

>From what I know there is no functional and api difference between 3.2.x and 3.3.x, so you should be able to use 3.2.x from now on. The only difference was the console afaik.... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4219299#4219299 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4219299

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Confused about versioning

by mauromol

"thomas.diesler(a)jboss.com" wrote : Yes, everything you commit to trunk will go into the next jbpm-3.2.x release. There will be no further jbpm-3.3.x release anymore. | No further 3.3.x releases?!?!?! We recently migrated our jBPM integration from 3.2.x to 3.3.x and now you say that you'll go to update just 3.2.x branch? Why? What should we do now? Mauro. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4219178#4219178 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4219178

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - ant task for starting jboss

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

in the context of running hudson platform independent, i was searching for the ant task to start jboss and i found it. the ant task spawns a separate jboss process and it listens to the console as long as it doesn't see the message: " started in " so if someone wants to give it a go to leverage this ant task in our current build, let me know and I'll make the classes available somewhere View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4218919#4218919 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4218919

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - config generation committed

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

config generation committed View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4218915#4218915 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4218915

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

JBoss Tools 3 is out

by Heiko Braun

>> JBoss Tools 3 is out - see more at http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/JBossTools3IsHere Great, they included the BIRT tooling. Which means we have tooling support for the BPM reporting out fo the box. /Heiko

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: programmatic passing of environment objects

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

"heiko.braun(a)jboss.com" wrote : You can skip the 'finally' when using the callback because it's managed outside of the task service: | i don't think so. if the services remain process-engine-context scoped objects, then the callback object would have to be removed just like the provided objects themselves... i think. internally we only have 1 option: use a thread local to pass these objects down till the environment is created. in that case the services can remain process-engine-context scoped. if we use thread locals to pass the user provided objects or the callback handlers, that thread local cleanup is also needed for callback handlers. another alternative would be to create a new service object for each request. but then we would not be able to configure the services. users will not be able to configure customized services. maybe that is an other option to consider. but i don't yet see the full implications of that. feels scary to go that route View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4218535#4218535 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4218535

15 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

jbpm-dev March 2009