Tiho, a question for you.. why guvnor cannot host a file? I mean.. I'm not
sure how Porcelli is creating the war files for the services, but we can
generate something similar right? some meta information, some images, some
configuration files, etc, when the user or a client like eclipse want to
get the workitemhandler installed it just create a zip file with all the
required dependencies and it send that back to the client. In that way we
will gain versioning, categorization and tagging for free..right? Plus the
possibility in the future to manage that with a workflow for approvals if
we add that for all the other resources.
Probably I'm missing something but I don't understand what is the Guvnor
limitation to host files or descriptors, we are already doing that for
spring beans configs.
Cheers
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Tihomir Surdilovic <tsurdilo(a)redhat.com>wrote:
I'm not sure if Guvnor is the best place for it - because assets
that are
stored in Guvnor are not very portable as a "unit" outside of Guvnor. I
would rather make it in a way work like maven -> users can specify the
"parent" repository which can be one that we provide for the community with
all out-of-the-box services nodes and run mvn clean install which will
build their local repo that they can expose on any public domain or server
they wish, any way they wish..just my 2c.
On 3/13/12 12:11 PM, Mauricio Salatino wrote:
At some point those definitions should be stored in guvnor right? Until
now I think it's just a folder with some meta-data files to define what is
in there, but I think that it really make sense to put that functionality
inside guvnor that is a fully fledged repository right?
Guvnor already provide the APIs to push resources, and we definitely need
to add a kind of workflow for resources.. but it's not there yet.
Cheers
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Giovanni Marigi <gmarigi(a)redhat.com>wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to know the status of service task repository;
> I really appreciate the idea behind it and delivering some POC, customers
> were really enthusiastic about this feature (especially its integration
> with jbpm designer and BRMS) but it seems that the actual repo doesn't have
> some new effort.
> Will we provide API to push service tasks to the repository? I think it
> should be useful to provide some mechanism to approve a new service task
> before to make it public.
>
> Thanks,
> Giovanni
>
> --
> Giovanni Marigi
> Red Hat - JBoss Consultant -
> email: gmarigi(a)redhat.com
> Mobile: +39 3423175986 <%2B39%203423175986>
> Office: +39 0687502315 <%2B39%200687502315>
>
> Red Hat Italy
> Via Andrea Doria 41m
> 00192 Roma - Italy
>
www.redhat.com
>
> Prima di stampare, pensa all'ambiente ** Think about the environment
> before printing
> _______________________________________________
> jbpm-dev mailing list
> jbpm-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbpm-dev
>
--
- MyJourney @
http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- Co-Founder @
http://www.jugargentina.org
- Co-Founder @
http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
_______________________________________________
jbpm-dev mailing
listjbpm-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbpm-dev
--
- MyJourney @
http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- Co-Founder @
http://www.jugargentina.org
- Co-Founder @
http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -