February 2009 - jbpm-dev - Jboss List Archives

by Thomas Diesler

Hi Alejandro, it looks like you need a hand with your 3.2.6 issues? If you don't mind I would pick one or the other up if it is not in progress already and I have some spare time. -thomas

17 years, 2 months

2
2
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: EJB3 enterprise module?

by camunda

Damn, it seems that linking a Timer to an EJB3 Entity seems not to be possible like in EJB 2.1 (regarding https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-886). Or if anybody has an idea I would be delighted. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4209081#4209081 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4209081

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

gpd-3.1.7 status

by Thomas Diesler

Hi Koen, could you please give me a quick heads-up on gpd-3.1.7, especially if you will release on time for jbpm-3.2.6 https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-1961 cheers -thomas

17 years, 2 months

2
2
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Confused about versioning

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Yes, everything you commit to trunk will go into the next jbpm-3.2.x release. There will be no further jbpm-3.3.x release anymore. All additional features that went into jbpm-3.3.x have been taken out again in favour of upcoming jbpm4 releases. Specifically, you should see support for the GWT console in jbpm-4.0.0.Alpha2, which should come out on 1-Mar-2009. Future jbpm-3.2.x releases must be strictly backward compatible in DB and API for former jbpm-3.2.x releases and will only contain bug fixes - and no new features. Hope that clarifies it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208999#4208999 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208999

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - email templates

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

imo the first direction to search for the solution is a separate, dummy SEAM web app that is only used for our email templating. maybe that webapp could be secured to only allow access from localhost... other opinions on email templating ? below the response from pete muir when i asked him if it was possible to run seam email templating without JSF. the answer was no. anonymous wrote : > Yeah, you need JSF and Facelets for Seam mail. | > | > I was working on having it so Seam mail would be able to use JSF even if | > it wasn't running in an application server (i.e. Seam mail would boot | > JSF itself), but this never got 100% finished. | > | > On 10 Feb 2009, at 13:11, Tom Baeyens wrote: | > | >> Hi Pete, | >> | >> Since MailFacesContextImpl extends DelegatingFacesContext, i assume | >> that seam leverages the delegate faces context from the jsf | >> implementation and hence it can only run inside a JSF application, | >> right ? | >> | >> Or is it also possible with the seam-mail classes to generate mails in | >> a standalone java app ? | >> | >> -- | >> regards, tom. | View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208991#4208991 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208991

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Questions on EJB2 enterprise module

by camunda

Hi Tom. Yeah, thanks! I already saw that (in JIRA and code)... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208989#4208989 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208989

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: facelets email generation

by Tom Baeyens

ok, thanks. regards, tom. Pete Muir wrote: > Yeah, you need JSF and Facelets for Seam mail. > > I was working on having it so Seam mail would be able to use JSF even if > it wasn't running in an application server (i.e. Seam mail would boot > JSF itself), but this never got 100% finished. > > On 10 Feb 2009, at 13:11, Tom Baeyens wrote: > >> Hi Pete, >> >> Since MailFacesContextImpl extends DelegatingFacesContext, i assume >> that seam leverages the delegate faces context from the jsf >> implementation and hence it can only run inside a JSF application, >> right ? >> >> Or is it also possible with the seam-mail classes to generate mails in >> a standalone java app ? >> >> -- >> regards, tom. >> > -- regards, tom.

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Questions on EJB2 enterprise module

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

couple of other points you need to know if you're going to work in this area: * alejandro recently reported in a forum thread that exclusive messages are processed sequentially by 1 MDB. we need to verify that each job runs in its own transaction. (maybe that is what you are actually reporting related to "ExecuteJobsCommand that much easier than the ExecuteJobCommand") * i forgot the other point :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208963#4208963 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208963

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: EJB3 enterprise module?

by heiko.braun＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | so what you're saying is that with ejb3, there is a bigger chance that the .ear file will run without modifications on lets say websphere or weblogic ? | right View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208962#4208962 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208962

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: EJB3 enterprise module?

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

"heiko.braun(a)jboss.com" wrote : I think the biggest problem with the CMP based implementation is the container dependence. It always requires a vendor specific persistence mapping. But if we move to JPA we get rid of that problem. that makes sense to me. (and makes me change my mind) so what you're saying is that with ejb3, there is a bigger chance that the .ear file will run without modifications on lets say websphere or weblogic ? if that is true, then i'm in favour of moving to ejb 3. with ejb 2, we will not have the time to build those appserver specific deployment descriptors. so ejb 3 would give us better coverage of environments. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208960#4208960 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208960

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

jbpm-dev February 2009