February 2009 - jbpm-dev - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - hibernate cache challenge

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

the first that can explain me why hibernate logs indicate that it still goes to the DB after a cache hit gets a http://www.abbaye-de-leffe.be/SITES/abbaye-de-leffe.be/IMG/gif/brune.gif 10:49:22,031 FIN | [NonstrictReadWriteCache] Caching: org.jbpm.pvm.internal.model.ProcessDefinitionImpl#1 | 10:49:22,031 FIN | [NonstrictReadWriteCache] Cache lookup: org.jbpm.pvm.internal.model.ProcessDefinitionImpl.attachments#1 | 10:49:22,031 FIN | [NonstrictReadWriteCache] Cache hit | 10:49:22,031 FIN | [SQL] | /* load org.jbpm.pvm.internal.lob.LobCached */ select | lobcached0_.DBID_ as DBID1_10_0_, | lobcached0_.DBVERSION_ as DBVERSION2_10_0_, | lobcached0_.BLOB_VALUE_ as BLOB3_10_0_, | lobcached0_.BINARY_VALUE_ as BINARY4_10_0_, | lobcached0_.CLOB_VALUE_ as CLOB5_10_0_, | lobcached0_.TEXT_VALUE_ as TEXT6_10_0_ | from | JBPM_LOB lobcached0_ | where | lobcached0_.DBID_=? | 10:49:22,031 FST | [LongType] binding '1' to parameter: 1 | 10:49:22,031 FST | [IntegerType] returning '0' as column: DBVERSION2_10_0_ | 10:49:22,031 FST | [BinaryType] returning null as column: BINARY4_10_0_ | 10:49:22,031 FST | [TextType] returning null as column: TEXT6_10_0_ View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208426#4208426 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208426

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: signal on ended token

by cvl

*Copied from post in mailing list* Hi. Are we considering the use case of "having non ended subprocesses, when parent process is ended"? With this solution, this would throw an exception, right? "that you should not signal a process instrance that has been ended sounds trivial to me" - Tom well, that's what _jbpm itself_ does, when returning from subprocesses to ended parent process. good luck, cvl View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208391#4208391 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208391

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: facelets ?

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

i'll look into seam. they do email templating. i wonder if they leverage the JSF from the environment for that or if they stub JSF for the email templating specifically. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208382#4208382 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208382

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Confused about versioning

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

you're right brad. 33x is with gwt console 32x is without gwt console 32x productization is being finalized. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208379#4208379 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208379

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Problems with change in ConstructorInstantiator

by alex.guizar＠jboss.com

Hi Bernd. Thank you for spotting this. Fortunately the refactoring is fairly recent and no compatibility has been broken in any released version. I'll go ahead and fix it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208339#4208339 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208339

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: oryx and jbpm

by kukeltje

Funny enough, I've been in contact with them as well (ok, just one mail). I have two remarks though on two points from Heiko b) Imo there is already a central process in many environments... cvs/svn that is needed anyway for most development processes. It would be harder, gouvernance wise to keep, two in sync regarding versioning etc... c) I compared the orbeon editor and oryx and for my system I think I go for oryx. The reason for this is that I do not use orbeon for rendering the forms, but Chiba. The orbeon xforms editor is imo more mature and usable then the oryx one, at least for now. The orbeon one is html/form oriented and the oryx one is (ab)using an originally process/graphical oriented to 'try' to design form. So if you decided to go with orbeon for rendering xforms (if the choice is made to use xforms which I would applaude), then why not go with their editor. My personal favourite is even a different direction. The JBoss VPE can be extended to display any type of html when a specific tag is encountered. See the Docbook example So also display xforms View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208336#4208336 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208336

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: facelets ?

by kukeltje

correct, but if you want to use it for templating email, you do need it anyway... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208334#4208334 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208334

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: signal on ended token

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

i don't mind, but sync with Alejandro and Thomas. and make a very clear note about it in the release notes. as this is a backwards incompatible change. (i agree: a reasonable one) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208165#4208165 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208165

17 years, 2 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Confused about versioning

by bradsdavis

I think that 3.2.6 is the same as the 3.3.x branch, but without the jbpm console from 3.3 branch. The 3.3 console has GWT, and it is not supported in the 3.2 branch. So, they have taken patches for the 3.3 branch not related to the console, and also applied them to the 3.2 branch. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208237#4208237 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208237

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Problems with change in ConstructorInstantiator

by camunda

To not forget it I already committed a test case for this behavior which currently fails... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208236#4208236 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4208236

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

jbpm-dev February 2009