[Design of JBoss jBPM] - IdentityService API Usage update
by jeff.yuchang
Hi all,
Noted from the test cases code, we all use the groupName as groupId by default, this is fine with the jbpm-built-in implementation, as these two are the same, but they are different in the jboss idm implementation.
So I am going to update those test cases, using the groupId, instead of groupName, take org.jbpm.examples.mail.inline.InlineMailTest.java for example:
| identityService.createGroup("thinkpol");
| identityService.createGroup("innerparty");
| identityService.createMembership("obrien", "thinkpol");
| identityService.createMembership("charr", "innerparty");
| identityService.createMembership("obrien", "innerparty");
|
I will updated it as:
| String groupId1 = identityService.createGroup("thinkpol");
| String groupId2 = identityService.createGroup("innerparty");
| identityService.createMembership("obrien", groupId2);
| identityService.createMembership("charr", groupId1);
| identityService.createMembership("obrien", groupId1);
|
Any comments on this update? any objections??
Thanks
Jeff
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236891#4236891
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236891
17 years
[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: EJB 2.1 Beans in jbpm 4?
by camunda
Okay, I have to investigate a bit more here as well. But i still think, there is a use case to use the CommandService, e.g.
- sending Commands either via JMS asynchronously or execute the synchronously (think of batch operations)
- migration from jbpm 3, would be possible to write a simple "CommandTranslator" and plug it in the CommandService, so you don't have to change existing client code using Commands (okay, maybe you have to change some, but not all)
So basically I like the CommandService and want to keep it for sure in the API, don't make it internal please.
And I still would like to see an EJB3 implementation. For us, the development team, to make it easier but as well for marketing purposes (even if you don't see it in the code, the people ask what runs under the hood). But maybe it doesn't have a high priority, ok...
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4236879#4236879
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4236879
17 years