July 2009 - jbpm-dev - Jboss List Archives

Hudson build completed: jbpm4-jboss » oracle,5.0.0.GA,java16_default,dev45 #91

by jboss-qa-internal＠redhat.com

See http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbpm4-jboss/./DATABASE=oracle,JBOSS...

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Hudson build completed: jbpm4-jboss » mysql,5.1.0.GA,java15_default,dev45 #91

by jboss-qa-internal＠redhat.com

See http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbpm4-jboss/./DATABASE=mysql,JBOSS_...

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Hudson build completed: jbpm4-jboss » mysql,5.1.0.GA,java16_default,dev45 #91

by jboss-qa-internal＠redhat.com

See http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbpm4-jboss/./DATABASE=mysql,JBOSS_...

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Hudson build completed: jbpm4-jboss » mysql,5.0.0.GA,java15_default,dev45 #91

by jboss-qa-internal＠redhat.com

See http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbpm4-jboss/./DATABASE=mysql,JBOSS_...

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Hudson build completed: jbpm4-jboss » mysql,5.0.0.GA,java16_default,dev45 #91

by jboss-qa-internal＠redhat.com

See http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbpm4-jboss/./DATABASE=mysql,JBOSS_...

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Hudson build completed: jbpm4-jboss » hsqldb,5.1.0.GA,java15_default,dev45 #91

by jboss-qa-internal＠redhat.com

See http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbpm4-jboss/./DATABASE=hsqldb,JBOSS...

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Hudson build completed: jbpm4-jboss » hsqldb,5.1.0.GA,java16_default,dev45 #91

by jboss-qa-internal＠redhat.com

See http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/jbpm4-jboss/./DATABASE=hsqldb,JBOSS...

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: New console snapshot published, Task Forms included

by SNy

OK, while the dynamic approach ain't working, I'll workaround by hardcoding the template options (it's a mockup, anyway, so the main aim is to get it working ASAP). As far as suggesting a solution, I guess it depends on wether or not the outcome (as in: result of the action) is actually useful in subsequent process steps. If not, it probably should not be introduced into the process at all. I don't have sufficient insight into the ways of jBPM yet and therefore don't know about side-effects. Another idea would be to have the default context stuff that you put into the form as an independent element/namespace 'ctx' or somesuch, containing everything that would go there (it would be nice, BTW, to have a list of the items one can use, I looked in vain for the activity name). 'ctx' should then be regarded as reserved in some way and not be taken from the process. Or, maybe it would be even better to encapsulate the process variables in an element/namespace of their own, maybe named 'process'? Just my 2 cent, regards, Marko View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4245829#4245829 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4245829

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

WG: [JBossESB] - Re: upgrade to jbpm4

by Bernd Rücker

Does anybody knows who will be responsible of this? At least I would like to keep a close eye on it (the last integration wasn't really good)... -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Kevin.Conner(a)jboss.com [mailto:do-not-reply@jboss.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. Juli 2009 14:41 An: bernd.ruecker(a)camunda.com Betreff: [JBossESB] - Re: upgrade to jbpm4 There is no support for jBPM 4 within the current ESB codebase as that version has only recently been released and it is a big change from the current, jBPM 3, codebase. The integration should not be too onerous, at least in theory, as we defer the majority of the processing to their codebase. Kev View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4245548#4245548 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4245548

16 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Party pooper? Back to work...

by Ronald van Kuijk

Guys, I hate to be the one to bring everybody back to reality after the release, but I would hate it to see improvements that were made over the last year slip again. Now I'm not talking about improvements in the engine which were for the outside mostly invisible. No, I'm talking about the much improved use of directly visible things like using the jira, wiki etc. Thomas did a great job in that regard. Deutsche Gründlichkeit is what we miss Now, I'd love to take that upon me, but my free time is becomming limited again and I think it should belong to someone directly in the project. Why do I bring this up now? http://www.jboss.org/community/docs/DOC-13217 contains several things. The most important being September 1st: jBPM-4.1 *Milestone* *Date* Jira Freeze July 22th Code freeze August 18th *Release* *September 1st* July 22th being yesterday. So this means the issue list for 4.1 is frozen now since I assume everybody had these dates in mind. If that is not the case, I'd like you all to go over your issues and see if they can be fixed before august 18th. If not, assign them to the next release, so expectations on the outside are realistic!!! In addition, I'd like this 'roadmap' page to be either kept up to date or for the most part just contain links to the jira. The way the details of features are mentioned there do not add anything to the fact that you can have these kinds of reports from Jira. e.g. by using labels if we do not want to have to many components. Going over issues that were reported lately against 4.0 is not wrong either, there might be some that can be fixed quickly and give a positive impression of the project. So come on and do your housecleaning duties by obeying this order or next time you guys all drink Heineken a full evening here in Utrecht. Ronald

16 years, 7 months

4
9
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

jbpm-dev July 2009