Re: [jbpm-dev] jBPM5 Request for Comments - feedback
Sebastian, good to know that.
Drools right now it's a full Business Logic integration Platform and it
includes a complete business process engine called Drools Flow.
The idea of the Drools platform is to be completely integrated to be able to
use both: rules and processes to model business situations. The big
difference in my opinion are the API and a less process centric vision in
Drools Flow. Because the idea is to have an API focused in business
knowledge (rules, processes, and every other business asset that helps us to
implement business solutions).
That's my two cents.
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Sebastian Schneider <
schneider(a)dvz.fh-aachen.de> wrote:
Hello Mauricio,
Am 17.04.2010 18:20, schrieb Mauricio Salatino:
> Hi Sebastian,
> Not sure about PVM, I think there are some differences with jBPM that
> need to be addressed.
> In drools flow there is already an advanced support for BPMN2, so it
> think we need to dig a little bit to find out big differences and
> missing points.
Does Drools Flow use a version of the PVM? Anyway, I never understood
completely what was the point of Drools Flow since in the first place
Drools is a business rules engine for me - and a good one - but not a
solution for the execution of complete processes.
I know that there are cases where a busines rule represents a kind of
flow and this is where Drools Flow fits in for me but I would never
consider task management part of it for example.
Just my 2 cents
Sebastian
--
Sebastian Schneider
e-mail: Sebastian.Schneider(a)alumni.fh-aachen.de
_______________________________________________
jbpm-dev mailing list
jbpm-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbpm-dev
--
- http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.6 KB)