"kukeltje" wrote :
| Still.... I get the feeling that extending the 'task handling process' a
little is not wrong, but making it really configurable is imo well.. not realy a waste of
time, but certainly not high priority... what we have is not that wrong. Putting two
eventhandlers on a definition is supported *now*, making it configurable takes a lot of
time
|
bull needed task lifecycle pluggability and it was not that hard. if we want to go far in
ease of use, then things could get more complicated.
probably it will be easier to just add the pluggability and agree upon a default then
agree whether a cancellation implies a task-end...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4180748#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...