the real solution is to implement it in the BPMN activity base class.
add a method to the BpmnActivity like leaveBpmnActivity(ExecutionImpl execution)
changing the pvm in this respect is not desirable. the generic behaviour of the proceed
is something that i think over time should be faded out. activities should be explicit in
what they want to see happening. combined default behaviour like in the proceed is always
process language specific. so it doesn't belong in the pvm proceed. it belongs in
the process language specific base classes.
(ps you already might have noticed that in our own implementations, it is best to use the
impl classes and not the interfaces)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4246857#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...