Ring Trevor and Julian as I have to go out. However, if you started from the right codebase when you created your branch as we assumed then we wouldn't be in the position of having to backport. You need to answer the following question: did you use the right codebase when creating the new jBPM 3 branch from which 3.2.5 is based? If the answer is 'no' then you will need to either bring 3.2.5 up to the right codebase or port the issues we need fixing in this release from 3.2.5 across to the SOA-P jBPM branch. There are no alternatives to that as far as I can see. Anyhow, for now I'll leave it in the capable hands of Trevor and Julian. Mark. On 6 Feb 2009, at 12:14, Thomas Diesler wrote: > Mark, can we perhaps have a conf call where we decide what to do? > > The last suggestion of porting 9 months worth of work back to the > 3.2.2 code base is getting rather funny. > > > Thomas Diesler wrote: >> If you don't have time, than please give me list of issues that you >> want me to verify. You svn diff you are talking about is 2MB >> (attached) and not suitable to draw any conclusion. >> How come the diff between jpdl-3.2.3 and jpdl-3.2.2-SOA-4.2.0.CP03 is >> so massive? Well I don't know - you need to talk to whoever mangaged >> those releases. >> Anyway, I dont think the diff approach will lead anywhere. Therefore >> I'd like to ask you again - please give me a specific list of SOA >> issues that you want me to check. >> Mark Little wrote: >>> thomas, we do not have time to argue this. You can see what jBPM >>> related issues have been fixed in the SOA-P JIRA by using a suitable >>> filter and remembering that we have been abiding by our release >>> process for over a year. But irrespective of that you (yes, you) >>> need to do an svn diff and make sure that the baseline code that you >>> took over matches what we required from the jBPM productization >>> process. If that is not the case then your only major customer for a >>> productized jBPM 3 (the SOA-P) is not being satisfied and you need >>> to fix that. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> Mark. >>> >>> >>> On 6 Feb 2009, at 11:35, Thomas Diesler wrote: >>> >>>> > Check JIRA. >>>> >>>> I don't even know what issues you are talking about. Let alone >>>> whether any SOA issues created and resolved during 3.2.2 and 3.2.3 >>>> (9 months) made it into the the jBPM test suite. >>>> >>>> I suggest you give me a defined list of SOA issues that you want me >>>> to verify. I can then see whether the jBPM testsuite has coverage >>>> for that. If it does not have coverage then test cases must be >>>> created and checked in the 3.2.5.SP branch. >>>> >>>> svn diff is IMHO no replacement for a successful hudson run. >>>> >>>> Mark Little wrote: >>>>> Check JIRA. But do an svn diff between the last SOA-P jBPM branch >>>>> we accepted and what you are giving us now. >>>>> Mark. >>>>> On 6 Feb 2009, at 11:20, Thomas Diesler wrote: >>>>>> Ok then lets see the list of SOA issues that we talk about and >>>>>> find the associated test case in the jBPM testsuite that overs >>>>>> the given issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> Mark Little wrote: >>>>>>> Let's put it this way: we cannot release the current jbpm branch >>>>>>> until we have confirmation that other issues have not been lost. >>>>>>> Mark. >>>>>>> On 6 Feb 2009, at 10:44, trevor kirby wrote: >>>>>>>> Mark Little wrote: >>>>>>>>> Do we know if any other issues from the branch we were using >>>>>>>>> are missing in action? >>>>>>>> We have no confirmation either way, so we will have to check, >>>>>>>> Thomas does your hudson setupgive you any information about >>>>>>>> SOA related jiras that it tests against? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Trev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Mark. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 6 Feb 2009, at 10:40, trevor kirby wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mark Little wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> What's the status? >>>>>>>>>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2017 - according to >>>>>>>>>> the jira comment - Corrected >>>>>>>>>> HibernateStringInstance.hbm.xml, made the correction work for >>>>>>>>>> Sybase/jConnect, wrote test case. >>>>>>>>>> There was also an associated late night checkin, thanks >>>>>>>>>> Alejandro. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2018 - should also be >>>>>>>>>> fixed by this. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-2005 - examples - >>>>>>>>>> they are still missing, but that is not a blocker. Thomas do >>>>>>>>>> we have an ETA? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA-1157 - fixed by moving >>>>>>>>>> to 3.2.5 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We are pulling the build and checking. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Trev >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Mark. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 5 Feb 2009, at 19:27, trevor kirby wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Alejandro Guizar wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> I just joined the channel. I kinda prefer email, but I'll >>>>>>>>>>>>> meet you guys >>>>>>>>>>>>> there. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We are in the UK, so you joined just after we left :-( >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Trev >>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alejandro >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> El jue, 05-02-2009 a las 13:58 +0000, trevor kirby escribió: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alejandro can you hop onto #jbosssoa please so we can >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lose some of the time lag in this discussion. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trev >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Coleman wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you actually changing stuff at that level? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We don't make any changes here in the SOA platform build >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A change at that level is not cosmetic and effectively >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> invalidates our QA. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Indeed. So this change will require a re-test. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you saying that this issue needs to be reopened? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. The previous SOA version had a length of 4000, so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this one needs it as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is the changeset that removed length="4000" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://fisheye.jboss.org/changelog/JbpmSvn?cs=2440 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the pointer. I've tried reversing the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removal of the length 4000 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parts of that changeset, but the generated sql still has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (e.g.) varchar(255) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and nothing with length 4000, so I must be missing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe Alejandro can fill in the details why >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> length="4000" was removed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That might be useful. Somehow, we need it back though ;-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> J >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>> Mark Little >>>>>>>>>>> mlittle(a)redhat.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat >>>>>>>>>>> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 >>>>>>>>>>> Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. >>>>>>>>>>> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. >>>>>>>>>>> 3798903 Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters >>>>>>>>>>> (USA), Matt Parsons (USA) and Brendan Lane (Ireland). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> Mark Little >>>>>>>>> mlittle(a)redhat.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat >>>>>>>>> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 >>>>>>>>> Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. >>>>>>>>> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. >>>>>>>>> 3798903 Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters >>>>>>>>> (USA), Matt Parsons (USA) and Brendan Lane (Ireland). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> Mark Little >>>>>>> mlittle(a)redhat.com >>>>>>> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat >>>>>>> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 >>>>>>> Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. >>>>>>> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. >>>>>>> 3798903 Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters >>>>>>> (USA), Matt Parsons (USA) and Brendan Lane (Ireland). >>>>> --- >>>>> Mark Little >>>>> mlittle(a)redhat.com >>>>> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat >>>>> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 >>>>> Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. >>>>> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 >>>>> Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA), Matt >>>>> Parsons (USA) and Brendan Lane (Ireland). >>> >>> --- >>> Mark Little >>> mlittle(a)redhat.com >>> >>> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat >>> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod >>> Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. >>> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 >>> Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA), Matt >>> Parsons (USA) and Brendan Lane (Ireland). >>> >>> >>> --- Mark Little mlittle(a)redhat.com JBoss, a Division of Red Hat Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA), Matt Parsons (USA) and Brendan Lane (Ireland).