The console roadmap we disussed beginning of august aims at a replacement of the console in 3.2 for end of november. it requires at least a release cycle for public review before it will go into the platform.

IMO the console will have a release cycle on it's own and can subsequently be included via CP or as a point release in the community download. In general I'd say the JSF is dead as long as we find someone to maintain it.

/Heiko On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 14:34 +0200, Tom Baeyens wrote: > Heiko, > > I would like to get an idea of what you intend to do for BI in jBPM 3.3.0 GA. > > I know there are currently 2 strategies on the table: > > 1) replace the JSF based console with a GWT based one. > 2) add the page with some statistics to the current JSF console. > > Given the timeframe, option 1 seems impossible to me, but I would like to hear your > thoughts on the matter. > > If you want to see what Fady had cooked, I think I should be able to get that running > on my machine... Let' me know if you would like to take a look. >

On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 09:01 +0200, Tom Baeyens wrote: > Heiko Braun wrote: >> The console roadmap we disussed beginning of august aims >> at a replacement of the console in 3.2 for end of november. >> it requires at least a release cycle for public review before it will go >> into the platform. > What is expected in jbpm-3.3.0.GA targetted for Nov 1st ? How much will the new > console differ in functionality from the JSF based console ? Nothing. The earliest release would be 3.3.1.GA > Which console will be shipped in jbpm-3.3.0.GA both or only the new one ? > The old one. As I said, the console roadmap sets the first release for end of november. > Do you anticipate to maintain backend pluggability for 3 and 4 ? Or will the jBPM 4 > console be a fork ? > The jbpm3 gwt-console will go into maintainance (branch) and trunk will used for jbpm4. So basically it's a fork, yes. >> IMO the console will have a release cycle on it's own >> and can subsequently be included via CP or as a point release in the >> community download. >> >> In general I'd say the JSF is dead as long as we find someone to >> maintain it. > I thought it would be easier to put the JSF console together jBPM 3 in maintenance > after 3.3.0.GA. But that's your call. If you think you can get something in jBPM 3 > which is roughly the same functionality and stability, then of course from a > supportability point of view that is a good improvement. > > regards, tom. > > >> /Heiko >> >> On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 14:34 +0200, Tom Baeyens wrote: >>> Heiko, >>> >>> I would like to get an idea of what you intend to do for BI in jBPM 3.3.0 GA. >>> >>> I know there are currently 2 strategies on the table: >>> >>> 1) replace the JSF based console with a GWT based one. >>> 2) add the page with some statistics to the current JSF console. >>> >>> Given the timeframe, option 1 seems impossible to me, but I would like to hear your >>> thoughts on the matter. >>> >>> If you want to see what Fady had cooked, I think I should be able to get that running >>> on my machine... Let' me know if you would like to take a look. >>>