"heiko.braun(a)jboss.com" wrote : Quoting Bruce Silver:
|
| anonymous wrote :
| | BPMN is a modeling notation more than just a diagram, since each element has
defined process semantics, abstracted from implementation details but BPMN has no official
XML schema, i.e. no interchange format.
| | [...]
| | Bottom line is that neither XPDL nor BPEL today meets the real need of the BPM
community, which is a portable serialization of process models not diagrams, models that
is independent of implementation architecture.
| |
|
| Taken from:
|
http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/03/21/the-real-issues-with-xpdl-bp...
|
|
I agree. BPMN is indeed the only standard that has a real focus on the BPM community.
But Bruce's opinion is just one in a very crowdy and dissonant metal rock band.
http://blog.lombardicto.com/
http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2008/07/14/manchurian-candidate-in-the-...
http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/07/BPMNDebate
http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/05/BPMN20
http://www.column2.com/2008/03/the-great-bpmn-debate/
So my conclusion is that BPM landscape is not mature at all and the current standards are
not viable candidates to limit ourselves to.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4164951#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...