I see more and more projects moving to EJB3. The stuff is easier to understand and even easier to deploy. Actually only having EJB 2.1 support sometimes let jbpm looks "old-fashioned" (never underestimate the marketing factor!). And as I mentioned, I am asked quite a lot for ejb3. Since you often include jbpm in your own environment or application ejb 3 offers better support. E.g. extending the beans or adding interceptors is easier. And some stuff seems to be better supported with EJB 3 in respect to clustering. Currently I am rewriting it anyway, so the question comes to if I should commit it, the effort would be reduced to maintenance. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4208936#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...