LOL,
Yep, I think there was some misunderstanding earlier ;)
Normal service has been restored - other than jBPM POM's on master which
show the release as 6.0.0-SNAPSHOT... Mark said you won't be doing a
5.5.0-SNAPSHOT before 6.0.0-SNAPSHOT so consider it a bonus ;)
I'd appreciate it if someone with jBPM knowledge could check what's in git
on master (for jBPM) is OK now....
Cheers,
Mike
On 15 October 2012 14:23, Marco Rietveld <mrietvel(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Mike,
Eh, I should probably qualify my "Roger" messages on IRC.
The "Roger" I gave on IRC was simply: "I have heard your message and I
understand." I assumed that you meant 5.4.x given that jBPM has "lagged"
a
release behind Drools for the past year.
As far as I understand, 5.5.0-SNAPSHOT is our current master.
We have created a 5.4.x branch which the current release will be based on.
I believe that once we move to 6.x, Drools and jBPM will start keeping the
same release numbers. However, this will mean that we either have stricter
release schedules (every 4 months, EXACTLY) or that Drools will sometimes
have to release in order to accomdate jBPM, as well as the other way around.
Thanks,
Marco
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Anstis" <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com>
> To: "Tihomir Surdilovic" <tsurdilo(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "drools-dev" jboss.org>, "jBPM Dev List" jboss.org>,
"Kris
Verlaenen"
> <kris.verlaenen(a)gmail.com>, "Marco Rietveld"
<mrietvel(a)redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 2:00:59 PM
> Subject: Re: Drools and jBPM 5.5.x branches have been created
>
> Hi Tiho,
>
> I saw Kris had changed jBPM's POMs to 5.5.0-SNAPSHOT and Marco
> confirmed jBPM has moved to 5.5.x (and not 5.4.x as we had with
> Beta1) this morning. I am therefore (led to believe) 5.5.x is
> correct for jBPM.
>
> Since jBPM has been branched to 5.5.x I'd assume Designer and Form
> Builder had to branch too. Of course I could be mistaken, IDK your
> projects as well as you do.
>
> Mark sent an email over the weekend saying we were to start on CR1
> this week.
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Mike
>
>
> On 15 October 2012 12:55, Tihomir Surdilovic < tsurdilo(a)redhat.com >
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> We are releasing jBPM version 5.4 and not 5.5. Typically we would
> create the 5.5.x branch in jBPM after the 5.4.x release ...
> Not sure why jBPM Form Builder and Designer would need branching and
> POMs updates? Can you please explain?
>
> Overall it would be really nice if we could coordinate branch
> creation and releases (betas, crs, etc) in the cases where we are
> releasing Drools and jBPM together. We were not able to advertize
> jBPM Beta1 due to this.
>
> Thanks a lot.
> Tihomir
>
>
>
> On 10/15/12 7:41 AM, Michael Anstis wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Just a note to you all to advise that the 5.5.x branches have been
> made on github and Jenkins jobs setup accordingly.
>
> Should you make changes to master that are needed for 5.5.x please be
> sure to cherry-pick...
>
> There are a couple of remaining tasks:-
>
>
> * jBPM Form Builder - Needs branching and POM's updated.
> * jBPM Designer - Needs branching, POM's updated and Jenkins job
>
https://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/view/Drools%20jBPM/job/g...
> updated to build jBPM Designer 5.5.x.
> * jBPM contains properties overriding the Drools version in
> droolsjbpm-parent POM. I suspect these need changing in master
> to point to 6.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
>
> The jBPM Team wanted to handle these changes for 5.5.0.Beta1 so I
> have assumed the same for the branch.
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Mike
>
>
>