Re: [jsr-314-open] composite:insertFacet target facet name
When / where should this discussion take place? Do we want to have a
call for this?
In addition to this issue, Alexander raised the issue that f:insertFacet
and f:renderFacet are confusing. Not sure if there's anything we can do
resolve this at this point, but minimally, it would be worth ensuring
the EG members understand the difference (which IMO, is huge). In
hindsight, f:insertFacet probably should have been f:attachFacet, and of
course had an optional "target" attribute for Andy's case.
Ken
Andy Schwartz wrote:
Thanks Ed -
Ed Burns wrote:
>
> I happen to prefer #1, but everyone else favors #2, we'll go with #2.
>
Seems like some people prefer #2 as well, so perhaps this needs more
discussion.
> Andy, can you please file a spec issue and share the number with the
> group? Once you have it, I'll add an entry in the changelog wiki.
>
>
Sorry for taking so long to follow up on this. I have logged the
following spec issue:
https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=631
Andy