On 13 Sep 2009, at 22:53, Jim Driscoll wrote:
> I hope that AJAX4JSF is modified so that it builds on top of the
JSF
> standardized APIs instead of being a complete replacement for them.
That's something that can best to achieved by their customers
lobbying the AJAX4JSF people.
AFAIK, there's nothing to stop them specifically from adopting the
current API set - other than their reluctance to rewrite an existing
codebase. But that's based on the one link that you sent on - you'd
have to ask them directly if that's true.
Essentially this is the opposite of the RichFaces 4 plan (I agree, the
comment that this discussion is based on is ambiguous at best). Just
like ICEFaces, we intend to build RichFaces 4.0 on top of the JSF 2
Ajax API. I've asked Jay (RichFaces project lead) to blog in detail on
this to clear up the confusion :-)
From initial discussions with Alex, my understanding is JSF 2 Ajax
will account for around 70% of what was in Ajax4JSF (which IMO just
validates how complete JSF 2 Ajax is!). The remaining 20% has not been
specified (not ready yet, or no consensus or ...), and will be built
as extensions on top of JSF 2 Ajax.
HTH