Re: [jsr-314-open] [jsf2.next] <h:head> vs. <head>
2009/12/15 Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com>
It would be nice if it "just worked", and jsf would
automatically
add/detect he right place to link scripts & stylesheets.
I'm all for almost anything that removes developer responsibilities and
makes jsf easier to use.
+1. I always pitch h:head and h:body as necessary to coordinate with
resource relocation from h:outputScript and h:outputStylesheet, but it would
be great if you could just use <head> and <body> instead, and have
everything work.
david
Lincoln Baxter III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
Keep it simple.
On Dec 15, 2009 11:44 AM, "Roger Kitain" <Roger.Kitain(a)sun.com> wrote:
Yeah we'd have to revisit the way we do resource relocation possibly - or
make it more intrinsic.
Andy Schwartz wrote: > > Branching off the HTML5 thread... > > Jason Lee
wrote: >> >> On 12/15/09 ...
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 1.7 KB)