Re: [jsr-314-open] [426-BeanValidation] Default Enablement Change
Hi Ed,
if you ask for introduction of change 1, you should also ask for 2 - 1
without 2 doesn't make
much sense, right?
FWIW, for me Emmanuel's statement makes much sense - convention over
configuration, and a way to overrule convention by configuration is
all we should need!
regards,
Martin
On 3/10/09, Ed Burns <Ed.Burns(a)sun.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:41:16 -0800, Ed Burns
<Ed.Burns(a)Sun.COM> said:
EB> Change 1 Default default validator
EB> Change 2 Default value for VALIDATE_EMPTY_FIELDS
EB> Change 3 isDefault on @FacesValidator
I have taken Change 1 to the EE architecture team to ask for guidance,
since, as Emmanuel points out, our decision on this point is an
opportunity to influence the programming model used for EE6.
I'll let you know how it goes today.
Ed
--
| ed.burns(a)sun.com | office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces